18 U.S.C. § 1513 – Retaliating against witness/victim/informant

18 U.S.C. § 1513 – Retaliating Against Witnesses and Victims

Retaliation against witnesses, victims, and informants is a serious issue that can undermine the criminal justice system. 18 U.S.C. § 1513 is a federal law that prohibits retaliating against witnesses, victims, and informants and provides penalties for those who do. This article will explain what the law covers, real world examples, defenses, and the implications of the law.

What does 18 U.S.C. § 1513 prohibit?

This law has two main parts that prohibits:

• Retaliating against a witness, victim, or informant for providing information to law enforcement about a federal offense
• Retaliating against a witness, victim, or informant to prevent them from providing information to law enforcement about a federal offense

Retaliation under this statute can include threats, force, intimidation, misleading conduct, and bodily injury. The law covers retaliation against current and former witnesses, victims, and informants as well as retaliation against their family members.

For example, threatening to harm a witness for testifying against you in a federal trial would violate this law. So would physically assaulting a victim for reporting your crime to the FBI.

What are the penalties?

The penalties for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1513 depend on the nature of the retaliation:

• Retaliating with killing – Up to life in prison and/or death penalty
• Retaliating with attempted killing – Up to 20 years in prison
• Retaliating with bodily injury – Up to 20 years in prison
• Retaliating with threats – Up to 10 years in prison
• Retaliating with property damage – Up to 1 year in prison

As you can see, the more severe types of retaliation carry longer potential prison sentences. Conspiring to retaliate or attempting retaliation can also lead to prison time under this statute.

Real World Examples

Here are some real cases where people were prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1513 for retaliating against witnesses and victims:

• A man was sentenced to 10 years in prison for sending threatening letters to a witness who testified against his brother in a federal drug trial [1].
• A gang member was convicted under § 1513 for the murder of a 16-year old who was scheduled to testify against fellow gang members in a racketeering trial [2].
• A man received 2 years in prison for slashing the tires of a vehicle owned by a victim who reported being sexually abused by the man’s father [3].

As you can see from these examples, § 1513 covers a wide range of retaliatory conduct from threats and intimidation to assault and murder. Prosecutors often pursue charges under this statute when victims and witnesses are targeted for cooperating with law enforcement.

Defenses

There are some legal defenses that can be raised against charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1513:

• Lack of intent – The prosecution must prove you intended to retaliate against a witness or victim. If you can show there was no intent, it could defeat the charges.
• Self-defense – Retaliating to protect yourself or others from imminent harm may provide a defense in some cases.
• Duress – If you can show you were coerced into retaliating through threats of serious harm, it could provide a defense.
• First Amendment – The First Amendment protects speech in many instances, so threats or intimidation through speech alone may be protected.

An experienced criminal defense attorney can assess the evidence against you and determine if any viable defenses are available. The facts of each case will determine what defense strategies are possible.

Implications of 18 U.S.C. § 1513

There are some important implications and criticisms regarding 18 U.S.C. § 1513:

• Deters retaliation and protects witnesses – This law is intended to protect witnesses and victims who are especially vulnerable to threats or harm for cooperating.
• Promotes law enforcement – By protecting witnesses and victims, it makes them more likely to come forward and report crimes to law enforcement.
• Infringes on civil liberties – The broad definition of “retaliation” may infringe on free speech and other civil liberties in some cases.
• Disproportionate sentencing – The severe penalties, particularly for murder and attempted murder, have been criticized as disproportionate and excessive.
• Potential for abuse – Prosecutors could potentially abuse this statute to go after individuals for minor incidents that do not warrant federal charges.

The implications of 18 U.S.C. § 1513 demonstrate the delicate balance between protecting witnesses and victims versus safeguarding civil liberties. There are reasonable arguments on both sides of this issue.

Conclusion

Retaliating against witnesses, victims, and informants strikes at the heart of the criminal justice system. 18 U.S.C. § 1513 provides strong protections for those who cooperate with law enforcement and imposes stiff penalties on those who retaliate against them. However, critics argue this federal statute may infringe on free speech and disproportionately punish retaliation. There are also concerns about selective prosecution under the law. Understanding 18 U.S.C. §://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/oakland-man-sentenced-10-years-prison-threatening-witness”>https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/oakland-man-sentenced-10-years-prison-threatening-witness

[2] https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/ms-13-member-convicted-murder-and-witness-retaliation

[3] https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdmo/pr/jefferson-city-man-sentenced-retaliating-against-victim