24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

18 U.S.C. § 1363 – Buildings/property within special maritime jurisdiction

18 U.S.C. § 1363 – A Closer Look at the Law Against Malicious Destruction of Property

18 U.S.C. § 1363 is a federal law that prohibits the willful and malicious destruction or damage of buildings or property within U.S. special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. This law aims to protect important structures and assets from harm. But what exactly does it cover, and what are the penalties for violating it? Let’s take a closer look.

What Does the Law Prohibit?

Specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 1363 makes it illegal for a person to “willfully and maliciously” destroy or damage:

  • Any structure
  • Any conveyance (like a vehicle)
  • Any other real or personal property

This destruction or damage needs to occur within U.S. special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. This includes places like naval vessels, federal enclaves, and some waters within U.S. jurisdiction. So damaging a car on a military base or sinking a boat in U.S. coastal waters could potentially violate 18 U.S.C. § 1363.

What About Attempts or Conspiracies?

Under 18 U.S.C. § 1363, it’s not just the actual destruction or damage that’s prohibited. The law also bans attempts or conspiracies to commit those acts. So if someone tries but fails to burn down a warehouse on a naval base, or plans with others to sink a ship in U.S. waters, they could still face charges under this statute.

What Are the Penalties?

If convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1363, a person faces:

  • Up to 5 years in prison
  • Fines under the federal sentencing guidelines

But if the building damaged was a dwelling or a person’s life was endangered, the penalties jump up to:

  • Up to 20 years in prison
  • Fines under the federal sentencing guidelines

So this law takes malicious property damage seriously, especially when people’s homes or lives are put at risk.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

What Are Some Examples of Potential Violations?

To understand 18 U.S.C. § 1363 better, let’s look at some hypothetical examples of conduct that could potentially violate it:

  • A group of teenagers decide to vandalize a Coast Guard station, spray painting graffiti on the buildings. This could violate 18 U.S.C. § 1363 since it’s willful property damage on a federal facility.
  • An angry sailor sets fire to another crew member’s bunk on their U.S. Navy ship while out in international waters. This could be a 18 U.S.C. § 1363 violation since he intentionally damaged property aboard a U.S. naval vessel.
  • Protestors chain themselves to drilling equipment on an offshore oil platform in U.S. coastal waters. Their actions damage the equipment, potentially running afoul of 18 U.S.C. § 1363.
  • A person plants a bomb that detonates and destroys a warehouse on a U.S. military base. This could carry charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1363 since it was willful destruction of a building on federal land.

These examples help illustrate the broad range of conduct prohibited under 18 U.S.C. § 1363.

What Defenses Could Be Raised?

There are a few defenses that a person charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1363 could potentially raise. Some examples include:

  • Lack of intent – Arguing the damage wasn’t “willful and malicious.” Maybe it was an accident or the person didn’t know the property was covered under federal jurisdiction.
  • Intoxication – Claiming the person was involuntarily intoxicated at the time, negating intent.
  • Self-defense – Asserting the damage was necessary to protect oneself or others from harm.
  • Duress – Saying the person was coerced into committing the act through threats of violence.

The viability of any defense would depend on the specific facts and jurisdiction where charges are brought.

How Does This Law Interact with State Laws?

18 U.S.C. § 1363 is a federal statute, so it applies only to conduct within U.S. special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. But many states have their own laws prohibiting various kinds of property damage. If conduct violates both federal and state law, separate charges could potentially be brought in both state and federal court (absent double jeopardy issues). The federal case would likely focus on the jurisdictional element, while the state case would emphasize the actual property damage.

What’s the History and Purpose Behind This Law?

18 U.S.C. § 1363 has its roots in earlier federal statutes from 1909 and 1940 focused on protecting federal buildings and assets. Congress has expanded the scope of the law over time. The current version of 18 U.S.C. § 1363 was enacted in 1996. According to the Congressional Record, the present law aims to prohibit the destruction of any type of structure, vehicle, or property within federal jurisdiction. This serves the important purpose of safeguarding key federal facilities, vessels, and other assets that support government operations or personnel.

In Summary

18 U.S.C. § 1363 is a federal statute that makes it a crime to intentionally destroy or damage buildings or property within U.S. special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. Violations can lead to up to 20 years in prison, with stiffer penalties if dwellings or lives are put at risk. This law serves to protect vital federal facilities, vehicles, and assets from harm. It reflects the government’s interest in preserving property needed to support its personnel, operations and infrastructure.

Schedule Your Consultation Now
Enable referrer and click cookie to search for ddfc42cba9774784 4debb53ba0cb8581 [] 2.8.0-1