18 U.S.C. § 1513 – Retaliating against witness/victim/informant

18 U.S.C. § 1513 – Retaliating Against Witnesses and Victims

Retaliation against witnesses, victims, and informants is a serious issue that can undermine the criminal justice system. 18 U.S.C. § 1513 is a federal law that prohibits retaliating against witnesses, victims, and informants and provides penalties for those who do. This article will explain what the law covers, real world examples, defenses, and the implications of the law.

What does 18 U.S.C. § 1513 prohibit?

This law has two main parts that prohibits:

• Retaliating against a witness, victim, or informant for providing information to law enforcement about a federal offense
• Retaliating against a witness, victim, or informant to prevent them from providing information to law enforcement about a federal offense

Retaliation under this statute can include threats, force, intimidation, misleading conduct, and bodily injury. The law covers retaliation against current and former witnesses, victims, and informants as well as retaliation against their family members.

For example, threatening to harm a witness for testifying against you in a federal trial would violate this law. So would physically assaulting a victim for reporting your crime to the FBI.

What are the penalties?

The penalties for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1513 depend on the nature of the retaliation:

• Retaliating with killing – Up to life in prison and/or death penalty
• Retaliating with attempted killing – Up to 20 years in prison
• Retaliating with bodily injury – Up to 20 years in prison
• Retaliating with threats – Up to 10 years in prison
• Retaliating with property damage – Up to 1 year in prison

As you can see, the more severe types of retaliation carry longer potential prison sentences. Conspiring to retaliate or attempting retaliation can also lead to prison time under this statute.

Christine Twomey

2024-03-21

Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.

Brendan huisman

2024-03-18

Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!

Guerline Menard

2024-03-18

Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️

Keisha Parris

2024-03-15

Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.

Taïko Beauty

2024-03-15

I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!

Anthony Williams

2024-03-12

Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.

Loveth Okpedo

2024-03-12

Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience

Bee L

2024-02-28

Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.

divesh patel

2024-02-24

I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Load more

Google rating score: 4.9 of 5, based on 736 reviews

Real World Examples

Here are some real cases where people were prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1513 for retaliating against witnesses and victims:

• A man was sentenced to 10 years in prison for sending threatening letters to a witness who testified against his brother in a federal drug trial [1].
• A gang member was convicted under § 1513 for the murder of a 16-year old who was scheduled to testify against fellow gang members in a racketeering trial [2].
• A man received 2 years in prison for slashing the tires of a vehicle owned by a victim who reported being sexually abused by the man’s father [3].

As you can see from these examples, § 1513 covers a wide range of retaliatory conduct from threats and intimidation to assault and murder. Prosecutors often pursue charges under this statute when victims and witnesses are targeted for cooperating with law enforcement.

Defenses

There are some legal defenses that can be raised against charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1513:

• Lack of intent – The prosecution must prove you intended to retaliate against a witness or victim. If you can show there was no intent, it could defeat the charges.
• Self-defense – Retaliating to protect yourself or others from imminent harm may provide a defense in some cases.
• Duress – If you can show you were coerced into retaliating through threats of serious harm, it could provide a defense.
• First Amendment – The First Amendment protects speech in many instances, so threats or intimidation through speech alone may be protected.

An experienced criminal defense attorney can assess the evidence against you and determine if any viable defenses are available. The facts of each case will determine what defense strategies are possible.

Implications of 18 U.S.C. § 1513

There are some important implications and criticisms regarding 18 U.S.C. § 1513:

• Deters retaliation and protects witnesses – This law is intended to protect witnesses and victims who are especially vulnerable to threats or harm for cooperating.
• Promotes law enforcement – By protecting witnesses and victims, it makes them more likely to come forward and report crimes to law enforcement.
• Infringes on civil liberties – The broad definition of “retaliation” may infringe on free speech and other civil liberties in some cases.
• Disproportionate sentencing – The severe penalties, particularly for murder and attempted murder, have been criticized as disproportionate and excessive.
• Potential for abuse – Prosecutors could potentially abuse this statute to go after individuals for minor incidents that do not warrant federal charges.

The implications of 18 U.S.C. § 1513 demonstrate the delicate balance between protecting witnesses and victims versus safeguarding civil liberties. There are reasonable arguments on both sides of this issue.

Conclusion

Retaliating against witnesses, victims, and informants strikes at the heart of the criminal justice system. 18 U.S.C. § 1513 provides strong protections for those who cooperate with law enforcement and imposes stiff penalties on those who retaliate against them. However, critics argue this federal statute may infringe on free speech and disproportionately punish retaliation. There are also concerns about selective prosecution under the law. Understanding 18 U.S.C. §://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/oakland-man-sentenced-10-years-prison-threatening-witness”>https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/oakland-man-sentenced-10-years-prison-threatening-witness

[2] https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/ms-13-member-convicted-murder-and-witness-retaliation

[3] https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdmo/pr/jefferson-city-man-sentenced-retaliating-against-victim