24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

18 U.S.C. § 641 – Theft of government property

18 U.S.C. § 641 – Theft of Government Property

Theft of government property is a serious crime that can result in fines and imprisonment. 18 U.S.C. § 641 makes it illegal to steal, embezzle, or knowingly convert for personal use any government property, record, money, or thing of value.

This law applies to theft of property belonging to the U.S. government or any department or agency. It also applies to theft of property from government contractors and public universities that receive federal funding. So this covers a wide range of potential targets for theft.

What Does the Law Say?

The exact text of 18 U.S.C. § 641 states:

Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof; or

Whoever receives, conceals, or retains the same with intent to convert it to his use or gain, knowing it to have been embezzled, stolen, purloined or converted—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; but if the value of such property in the aggregate, combining amounts from all the counts for which the defendant is convicted in a single case, does not exceed the sum of $1,000, he shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

So in plain English, this law makes it illegal to:

  • Steal, embezzle, or knowingly convert U.S. government property for personal use
  • Sell, convey, or dispose of U.S. government property without authority
  • Receive, conceal, or retain U.S. government property knowing it was stolen

The penalties are up to 10 years in prison and/or fines if the value of the property exceeds $1,000. If the value is $1,000 or less, the penalties are up to 1 year in prison and/or fines.

What Counts as Government Property?

The law covers theft of both tangible and intangible government property. This includes physical items like equipment, cash, records, and supplies. It also includes intangible property like trade secrets, confidential information, and computer data or software.

Some examples of government property covered by 18 U.S.C. § 641 include:

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.
  • Money, stamps, or official checks belonging to the government
  • Supplies, inventory, or equipment used by government agencies
  • Classified documents or confidential information
  • Data, software, or intellectual property developed by the government
  • Benefits payments, such as Social Security or food stamps
  • Historical artifacts or records held in National Archives facilities

The law also applies to theft from government contractors or public universities receiving federal funding. So stealing property or data from these institutions that is connected to government contracts or grants would violate 18 U.S.C. § 641.

Proving Violations of 18 U.S.C. § 641

To convict someone of violating 18 U.S.C. § 641, prosecutors must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. The defendant stole, embezzled, converted, sold, conveyed, or disposed of U.S. government property, records, or things of value
  2. The defendant did so knowingly and willfully, not by accident or mistake
  3. The defendant intended to deprive the government of the use or benefit of the property either temporarily or permanently
  4. The property belonged to the U.S. government, a government agency, or a government contractor or funded entity
  5. The value of the stolen property exceeded $1,000 (for felony charges)

The key issues are usually proving the intent to steal or convert the property, establishing the value, and showing the property belonged to the government. Documenting the chain of custody and proving the property was within the care and control of the government at the time of theft is also important.

Defenses to 18 U.S.C. § 641 Charges

There are several possible defenses if charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 641:

  • No criminal intent – Argue you did not act “knowingly” or “willfully” but made an honest mistake.
  • Authorization – Claim you had permission or legal authority for your actions.
  • Return of property – If you returned or paid back what was taken, it may show lack of criminal intent.
  • Property value – Challenge the government’s valuation if it seems excessive.
  • Lack of ownership – Argue the property did not actually belong to the U.S. government.

Raising doubts about any of the elements the prosecution must prove could lead to an acquittal or hung jury. But self-defense and consent are not valid defenses to theft charges.

Recent Cases and Controversies

There have been a number of recent high-profile cases involving prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 641:

  • In 2013, Bradley Manning was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 641 for leaking over 700,000 classified government documents to WikiLeaks. He was sentenced to 35 years in prison.[1]
  • In 2019, Natalie Mayflower Sours Edwards, a senior advisor at the Treasury Department, was charged under 18 U.S.C. § 641 for leaking confidential financial reports to a BuzzFeed reporter. She pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 6 months in prison.[2]
  • In 2020, the Justice Department came under scrutiny for bringing 18 U.S.C. § 641 charges against protesters accused of minor acts of vandalism during racial justice protests in Portland and Washington D.C. Critics argued this stretched the law too far.[3]

There is an ongoing debate about whether 18 U.S.C. § 641 is sometimes misused by prosecutors to bring excessive charges for low-level non-violent property crimes during protests or civil disobedience.

Penalties for Violating 18 U.S.C. § 641

Violating 18 U.S.C. § 641 can potentially result in:

  • Up to 10 years in federal prison if the value of the stolen property exceeds $1,000
  • Up to 1 year in prison if the value of the property is $1,000 or less
  • Fines of up to $250,000 for individuals or $500,000 for organizations
  • Probation or supervised release after serving a prison sentence
  • Forfeiture of assets obtained from the crime
  • Restitution to compensate the government for losses

Sentences are determined based on federal sentencing guidelines that consider the defendant’s criminal history and specific circumstances of the case. But judges have discretion in imposing sentences within the statutory range.

Reporting Theft of Government Property

If you become aware of or suspect theft of government property, it should be reported immediately. Federal employees should report it to their supervisor, agency inspector general, or other appropriate authorities. Theft can also be reported to the General Services Administration Office of Inspector General hotline at 800-424-5210 or online at https://www.gsaig.gov/.

Citizens who observe theft of government property in progress should contact local law enforcement or call 911. But suspected theft by government employees can be reported to federal authorities for investigation.

Takeaways

  • 18 U.S.C. § 641 makes it illegal to steal or convert U.S. government property, records, money, or things of value.
  • Charges and penalties depend on the value of the stolen property, with stiffer penalties over $1,000.
  • The law covers both tangible property like equipment and intangible property like data or secrets.
  • Possible defenses include lack of criminal intent, authorization, returning property, challenging the valuation, or disputing government ownership.
  • Violations should be reported to supervisors, agency inspectors general, GSA, or law enforcement authorities.

The bottom line is that theft of government property is a serious federal crime. Those who work with government assets must be cautious to avoid misuse and unintentional violations of 18 U.S.C. § 641. But overzealous prosecution is also a concern when applied to low-level non-violent infractions.

 

Schedule Your Consultation Now
Enable referrer and click cookie to search for ddfc42cba9774784 4debb53ba0cb8581 [] 2.8.0-1