Acquiring or Investing in Sanctioned Companies

Analyzing OFAC Sanctions Enforcement Trends

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals. OFAC has been very active in recent years, issuing new sanctions programs and bringing enforcement actions for violations of sanctions rules.

Understanding OFAC’s enforcement priorities and trends can help companies and individuals ensure they are in compliance with applicable sanctions programs. This article will analyze key developments in OFAC enforcement and highlight important lessons for sanctions compliance.

Recent OFAC Sanctions Highlights

In 2022, OFAC designated nearly 1,000 new entities under various sanctions programs, with a major focus on Russia-related measures following the invasion of Ukraine. Some highlights:

• Over 600 Russian-related designations, including major Russian banks, state-owned enterprises, oligarchs, and government officials[4].
• Numerous designations under the cyber-related sanctions program.
• Additions to the Chinese Military-Industrial Complex sanctions program.
• Designations under the Global Magnitsky sanctions targeting human rights abuses.

The unprecedented number of new Russia-related sanctions has significantly expanded the compliance burden for global companies. Firms must vigilantly screen customers, vendors, and transactions to avoid dealings with designated persons or prohibited sectors[1].

OFAC Enforcement Actions in 2022

In 2022, OFAC announced 16 public civil enforcement actions for apparent violations of various sanctions programs. This is lower than the prior two years, which saw 27 actions in 2021 and 30 actions in 2020[2].

While the overall number declined, settlement amounts remained high. OFAC collected over $1.1 billion in civil penalties in 2022, the second-highest amount ever. This reflects OFAC’s continued focus on pursuing large cases with major financial penalties[2].

Christine Twomey

2024-03-21

Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.

Brendan huisman

2024-03-18

Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!

Guerline Menard

2024-03-18

Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️

Keisha Parris

2024-03-15

Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.

Taïko Beauty

2024-03-15

I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!

Anthony Williams

2024-03-12

Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.

Loveth Okpedo

2024-03-12

Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience

Bee L

2024-02-28

Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.

divesh patel

2024-02-24

I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Load more

Google rating score: 4.9 of 5, based on 736 reviews

Some notable 2022 OFAC settlements include:

• JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. – $162 million for apparent violations of multiple sanctions programs[6].
• American Express – $372 million for apparent violations related to Cuba and other programs[6].
• PayPal – $7.6 million for apparent violations of global and country-specific sanctions programs[6].

These settlements serve as a reminder that even the most sophisticated global institutions struggle with sanctions compliance.

Key OFAC Enforcement Trends and Risk Areas

Analyzing OFAC’s recent enforcement actions reveals several trends and risk areas that companies should watch closely[2][3]:

Screening and Transaction Monitoring Failures

Many OFAC actions involve deficiencies in screening customer databases, vendors, or transactions for matches with sanctioned parties. Firms must screen across multiple sanctions programs and lists and conduct ongoing monitoring to detect prohibited dealings[5].

Non-U.S. Subsidiaries and Acquisitions

OFAC continues to pursue enforcement actions based on sanctions violations by non-U.S. subsidiaries of U.S. companies. Acquiring a company that has transacted with sanctioned parties can also lead to violations. Companies must ensure sanctions compliance controls extend across global operations[2].

Facilitation and Causing Violations

In addition to directly engaging in prohibited transactions, companies can face liability for causing or facilitating violations by other parties. This risk extends to banks, payment processors, and companies providing goods or services that enable sanctioned dealings[3].

Reexport Violations

Reexporting U.S.-origin goods to a sanctioned country or party can lead to violations, even if done by a non-U.S. entity. Screening for sanctioned reexport destinations is essential[2].

Exports to Russia

With expansive new Russia-related sanctions in place, OFAC is closely watching exports and reexports to Russia for signs of diversion to sanctioned end-uses or end-users[1].

Compliance Program Expectations

While enforcement actions often focus on specific compliance breakdowns, OFAC also assesses the overall adequacy of sanctions compliance programs. OFAC outlined its compliance expectations in a 2019 guidance document[3]:

• Management commitment to compliance
• Risk assessment
• Internal controls, including policies and procedures
• Testing and auditing
• Training
• Personnel accountability for sanctions compliance

Firms should evaluate their sanctions programs against these elements to identify and address gaps. Merely having a program on paper is not enough – it must be effectively implemented and consistently enforced[2].

Mitigating Potential Violations

Given the dynamic nature of sanctions programs, some compliance lapses are inevitable. However, companies can take steps to mitigate potential violations and penalties:

• Implement robust screening and transaction monitoring processes.
• Conduct periodic audits to identify program weaknesses.
• Provide regular sanctions training to employees.
• Encourage internal reporting of compliance issues.
• Undertake swift remedial actions and enhance compliance controls after identifying deficiencies.
• Consider voluntary self-disclosure of potential issues to OFAC.

Key Takeaways

As sanctions programs expand and enforcement scrutiny increases, companies must make sanctions compliance a top priority. By enhancing risk assessment, internal controls, and training, firms can reduce violations and penalties. Prompt remediation and voluntary disclosures also mitigate potential OFAC actions. With sound compliance practices, companies can manage sanctions risks and avoid severe enforcement outcomes.

References

[1] ICLG, “Russia Sanctions, OFAC Enforcement Trends, and Compliance Lessons Learned”

[2] Morrison Foerster, “U.S. Sanctions Enforcement: 2022 Trends and Lessons Learned”

[3] OFAC, “A Framework for OFAC Compliance Commitments”

[4] U.S. Treasury, “With Wide-Ranging New Sanctions, Treasury Targets Russian Military-Linked Elites and Industrial Base”

[5] SSRN, “Enforcing Economic Sanctions: Analyzing How OFAC Punishes Violators of US Sanctions”

[6] OFAC, “OFAC Settles with Poloniex, LLC for $7591630 Related to Apparent Violations of Multiple Sanctions Programs”

In addition to civil penalties, OFAC also pursues administrative actions against sanctions violators. These can include cautionary letters, finding of violation notices, and civil monetary penalties[4].

Key trends in OFAC’s use of administrative actions include[4][5]:

• Increasing use of non-public actions like cautionary letters to address minor or unintentional violations.
• Larger penalties for egregious or reckless violations, especially those involving high-risk jurisdictions.
• Requirements to overhaul sanctions compliance programs in addition to penalties.
• Focus on individual liability and penalties against corporate officers and managers.

While civil enforcement settlements receive more public attention, administrative actions make up the bulk of OFAC’s sanctions enforcements. Understanding potential administrative consequences is important for risk management.

Cooperation with Regulatory Partners

OFAC does not act alone in pursuing sanctions violators. It often partners with other government agencies and regulators in investigations and enforcements[6]:

• Department of Justice – criminal prosecutions
• State regulators – actions against banks and financial firms
• Securities and Exchange Commission – cases against public companies
• Federal Reserve – actions against banks under its jurisdiction

Regulatory coordination expands the consequences of sanctions violations beyond just OFAC penalties. It is critical to view OFAC enforcements as part of a broader risk management approach.

Future Outlook for OFAC Enforcement

Looking ahead, sanctions enforcement will likely remain elevated as geopolitical tensions persist globally. Companies should expect[7]:

• Continued focus on Russian sanctions violations
• Close monitoring of China-related dealings
• More enforcement actions related to ransomware payments
• Increased individual liability and penalties
• High settlement figures, especially for large institutions

While OFAC may be constrained by limited resources, sanctions compliance will stay an enforcement priority. Vigilance and adaptability will be key for managing sanctions risks.

With sanctions rules constantly changing, even companies with strong compliance programs can stumble. But those who proactively assess their sanctions exposure, adapt controls to address emerging risks, and undertake swift remediation efforts will fare far better when issues arise.