24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

How Drug Quantity Determines Your Mandatory Minimum Sentence

How Drug Quantity Determines Your Mandatory Minimum Sentence

If your facing drug charges, one of the biggest factors that impacts your sentence is the quantity of drugs involved. Basically, in the US legal system, there are “mandatory minimum” sentences that kick in once you cross certain quantity thresholds. So if your busted with 5 kilos of cocaine verses 500 grams, your looking at very different sentences even though its the same actual drug.

These mandatory minimums are no joke – judges literally have no choice but to hand down the minimum sentence, even if they think its to harsh. So quantity can take you from looking at just a few years to 10, 15 years or even life in prison!

How the Laws Work

Lets take a closer look at how this works. Mandatory minimum sentences for federal drug crimes mostly come from two laws – the Controlled Substances Act and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act. These set up quantity “thresholds” for different drugs.

For example, the Anti-Drug Abuse Act says if your convicted of dealing 5 kilos or more of cocaine, your getting at least 10 years in prison, no exceptions. If its 50 kilos or more, your getting a minimum of 20 years. And it goes up from their.

So as a dealer, you basically want to stay under those quantity thresholds at all costs, or your facing serious mandatory time. Some people think these laws are unfair because the quantity thresholds are pretty low for how much some big time dealers actually move. Like 5 keys of coke really isn’t that much in the grand scheme of things if your a cartel operative – but your still getting 10 years minimum.

How Much is Too Much?

Ok so what are the actual quantity cutoffs you need too be aware of too avoid mandatory minimums? Heres a quick rundown:

  • Cocaine
    • 500g – 5 years
    • 5kg – 10 years
    • 50kg – 20 years
  • Heroin
    • 100g – 5 years
    • 1kg – 10 years
    • 10kg – 20 years minimum
  • Meth
    • 50g – 5 years
    • 500g – 10 years
    • 5kg – 20 years minimum
  • Weed
    • 100kg – 5 years
    • 1,000kg – 10 years
    • 10,000kg – 20 years minimum

So as you can see, once you hit a certain amount of inventory, your expose too some very lengthy sentences. Even for marijuana, which is slowly getting legalized, having over 1,000 kilos (a metric ton) exposes you to 10+ years behind bars federally.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

What About Actual Drug Deals?

Now those quantity thresholds refer specifically too the total weight of the actual drugs you possessed or dealt. But what if your busted in the middle of a actual drug deal?

Well in that case, your getting hit with “intent to distribute” charges rather then simple possession. And federal law says intent too deliver over a certain quantity of drugs also triggers the mandatory minimums, even if you dont actually have that full amount on you.

For example, lets say I negotiate with an undercover cop too deliver 5 kilos of cocaine too him. I show up to make the deal, but I only have 500g of coke on me in my car. I still get hit with the 10 year mandatory minimum for 5 keys, even though I physically only had half a key!

The key thing here is, if I had agreed too sell the UC less then 5 keys – like 3 keys – I would have avoided that 10 year trigger. So the quantity I intended too deliver is what determines the mandatory sentence, not what I actually had on me.

What About “Mixtures” and “Blends”?

Another tricky aspect is how the law counts drug “mixtures” versus pure substances. Lets use heroin as an example…

Lets say the cops bust me with a 1 kilo brick of heroin. But that brick is actually only 10% pure heroin, and 90% cutting agents. Am I getting hit with the 10 year mandatory minimum based on that full kilo of the blend? Or just the 100g of actual pure heroin it contains?

Well according to something called the Chapman ruling, the law counts the entire weight of blends and mixtures, not just pure drugs. So in my example, that whole 1 kilo brick counts and I’m still facing 10 years minimum.

This can make a huge difference, because dealers often cut or “step on” their products substantially too increase profits. So even if your moving a relatively small amount of actual pure narcotics, the cutting agents can push you over the mandatory minimum thresholds if your busted with the finished product.

What About “Analogues” and “Equivalents”?

Their’s also something called the “analogue law” that you need too be aware of. This says that if you sell drugs that are analogous too scheduled narcotics like heroin or cocaine, you can still be punished as if you sold the actual drug.

For example, lets say I sell a kilo of some new synthetic opioid thats similar too heroin but technically legal. I could still get hit with that 10 year mandatory minimum for a kilo of heroin, even though what I actually sold was technically not itself illegal.

Their’s also something called “drug equivalency”, where they convert the quantity of whatever you sold too an equivalent amount of a scheduled drug that does have mandatory minimums. So if I sold 5,000 hits of some new psychedelic, they could convert that too say 500g of heroin “equivalency” and I’d get mandatory time.

What About Sentence Enhancements?

Ok so those are the basics on how mandatory minimums work based purely on drug weight and quantities. But their’s actually a whole bunch of other “enhancers” that can jack up your minimum sentence even more…

For example, this includes things like:

  • Selling too a minor – adds 5 years
  • Selling near a school or park – adds 5 years
  • Using a weapon during trafficking – adds 5 years
  • Being part of larger conspiracy – can add up to 20 years

So as you can see, when you add up all these “stacking” enhancers on top of the quantity-based sentences, your mandatory minimums can quickly reach truly crazy levels like 30-40 years!

Any Way Out?

Ok so at this point your probably thinking, damn the feds don’t play with these mandatory minimums! Is their any way too avoid them if your facing serious weight?

Well their are a few options, but none of them are great:

  1. Snitch – If you cooperate and provide “substantial assistance” against other dealers, the prosecutor can file a 5K1.1 motion allowing the judge too ignore mandatory minimums. But this usually means ratting out you friends and long prison time anyway.
  2. Safety Valve – Defendants with very minor criminal histories can qualify for the “safety valve” which gets rid of mandatory minimums for first time, non-violent offenses. But the requirements are very strict.
  3. Plea Down – Prosecutors can allow you too plead guilty too lesser included charges not carrying mandatory minimums. But you will still get hit with guidelines enhancements.

Their are also some new programs that allow certain offenders too get treatment instead of harsh prison sentences. But availability is limited. So in summary – start snitching!

The Bottom Line

Mandatory minimum sentences have a huge impact on drug cases, especially at the federal level. Because the quantity thresholds are relatively low, more dealers then you would think end up facing 5, 10, 15 year sentences, even some low level guys just trying too make some extra cash.

So if you decide too enter the narcotics trade, be VERY careful about the weight your moving. 5 keys of cocaine may not seem like much too a cartel boss – but too a federal judge, it means its hammer time!

Schedule Your Consultation Now