24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Is Drug Manufacturing With Intent to Distribute Worse than Personal Use?

 

Is Drug Manufacturing With Intent to Distribute Worse than Personal Use?

This is a complicated issue with arguments on both sides. Ultimately, it depends on your perspective and values.

Background on Drug Laws

U.S. drug laws make a distinction between drug use/possession for personal use and drug distribution/trafficking. Personal use is generally treated as a misdemeanor with lesser penalties, while distribution and trafficking charges carry much stiffer penalties and can be felonies.

Manufacturing drugs is typically considered a more serious offense than personal use. Intent to distribute adds further seriousness. So manufacturing with intent to distribute often carries heavy penalties by law.

Reasons Manufacturing and Distribution May Be Viewed as More Serious

There are several reasons why drug manufacturing, and especially manufacturing with intent to distribute, is treated more harshly under the law:

  • It involves making larger quantities of drugs, which enables more widespread use
  • It is seen as more organized criminal activity compared to individual use
  • It spreads harmful substances through communities more systematically
  • It enables and amplifies addiction issues rather than just fueling one person’s habit
  • It makes larger profits, so penalties aim to undermine the financial incentives

Because of these factors, lawmakers and much of society view manufacturing and distributing as more detrimental than personal use – and therefore deserving of greater deterrence through tougher legal penalties.

Counterarguments – Is Personal Use Also Serious?

However, others argue that personal drug use – especially addiction – causes plenty of harm as well. Consider:

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.
  • Drug addiction destroys lives, families, careers regardless of manufacturing or not
  • Addicts sometimes turn to theft, prostitution, or violence to fund their dependency
  • Health and social services spend heavily on issues stemming from addiction
  • If no one used drugs recreationally, there would be little market for illegal distribution

From this perspective, the personal decision to use dangerous, illegal substances recreationally is morally questionable and causes real damage. Without demand, there would be no supply. So while distribution enables wider use, personal irresponsibility is still at the root.

Two Sides of the Same Coin?

Given the arguments on both sides, some see drug use and drug distribution as two sides of the same coin. They argue:

  • Distribution networks simply supply the existing demand from users.
  • Without reckless use, there would be no market for trafficking.
  • Penalizing distribution alone can’t solve addiction issues.
  • Users should not get leniency while dealers get the book thrown at them – they are both knowingly engaging with dangerous illegal substances.

From this view, both demand and supply need deterrence. Singling out distribution for heavy penalties without addressing the underlying demand is an incomplete solution.

It’s Complicated – Reasonable Minds Can Disagree

As with many complex social issues around crime and punishment, there are good arguments on multiple sides of this issue. It ultimately depends a lot on one’s social and political philosophy.

Society does need order and deterrence of harmful behaviors. But addressing root causes of dysfunction usually works better than a purely punitive approach alone. There are also racial and socioeconomic biases that influence how drug laws get enforced.

Reasonable minds can disagree on the best balance of penalties and rehabilitation. There are merits to both arguments – distribution causes serious harms, but so does addiction. The solutions aren’t straightforward.

But in terms of current law, our society has made a definite distinction. Distribution is treated as the more serious offense deserving harsher penalties compared to personal use. Those who disagree with that approach should advocate to change the laws.

The Bottom Line

U.S. drug laws treat drug manufacturing and distribution offenses much more severely than drug possession for personal use. This aims to crack down harder on trafficking that spreads drugs through communities, while showing slightly more leniency to individual users.

However, others argue that rampant personal drug use fuels the demand that drives distribution networks. Some see both supply and demand sides as equally morally questionable. There are good arguments on multiple sides.

There are no easy answers. But under current law, manufacturing and distributing carries significantly stiffer penalties compared to possession for personal use in most cases.

 

Sources:

FindLaw, USC Health Policy, NCBI, UNODC, NCBI Bookshelf

Schedule Your Consultation Now