Criminal Defense Lawyers

MENTAL STATES IN A CRIMINAL CASE

In order to be found guilty of a crime, the defendant must have had a specific mental state that is included under the elements of the crime. Without that mental state, the defendant might be found guilty of the charge. The mental state of an individual is referred to as the “mens rea”, which is Latin for a guilty mind.[i] The concept of the mens rea is so important the in justice system because it is based off a belief that people should only be punished for their actions if they acted in a way that would make them morally blameworthy.[ii] According to the law, people who intentionally act in a way that is morally blameworthy should be held accountable for those actions.

There are many different states of minds that the justice system recognizes as being apart of a crime. To name a few, negligence, intentional, deliberate, and reckless are to just name a few. This article will discuss the various types of mental states and how each relates to the crimes associated.

In the world of criminal defense, if the defendant can prove that they did not have the mental state required for the crime, the court is going to be hard pressed to find the defendant guilty. For that reason, among many, it is important to understand the mental state that is required for each crime – especially if you are charged with committed a crime.

Criminal Negligence and Recklessness

The majority of crimes will require some type of intentional act, but many crimes only require the person to be reckless or negligent. For the most part, negligence is typically found in the realm of civil law – but there are still a few crimes that require just negligence or recklessness for the crime.[iii] Even though negligence and recklessness have different definitions – the two are basically seen as one in the same in an actual courtroom.[iv] Depending on the court, reckless will require that the defendant actually appreciate the risk in question, while criminal negligence requires that the defendant should have been aware of the risk.[v]

Some types of crimes that require only criminal negligence include criminally negligence homicide and negligent endangerment of a child. The first element involved with criminally negligent homicide is whether the defendant was aware of the unjustifiable risk associated with the events that led to the death of the other individual.[vi] An example of that would be if the victim and the defendant were playing with a gun, and then the victim was shot but the defendant, for whatever reason, refused to call for medical help.[vii] The defendant could be charged with criminally negligent homicide because most people understand and know that risks associated with a gunshot wound. It is also well know that a person could potentially die from a gunshot wound if not treated quickly after the injury. The fact that the defendant did not call for help after the victim was shot shows that he has a disregard for an unjustifiable risk, which was the potential death of his friend.

The next element associated with criminally negligent homicide is that there must have been an act or omission by the defendant.[viii] An example of this would be like the scenario listed above, where the defendant did not call for medical help after his friend had been shot. This would be considered an omission. Another example would be if a defendant were driving 50 miles per hour in a school zone, while children were being released from school.[ix] If the defendant hits and kills a child who was crossing the street at the time, there would be a direct cause and effect relationship from the defendant’s actions and the death of the child.[x] Some states require that there be a direct action, like the defendant speeding in the school zone, while other jurisdictions say that an omission is sufficient, like the defendant who refused to call for medical help.

The final element of criminally negligent homicide is causation.[xi] The act or omission by the defendant must have caused the death of the victim. If the state could prove the victim would have lived but for the defendant calling for medical help – the court will likely find that there was a causal connection between the omission and the result, which would find the defendant culpable for his actions.

Unintentional Conduct vs. Intentional Conduct

Those who are mistaken of fact and unintentionally engage in an illegal conduct could be found to be morally innocent because of that mistake.[xii] A person who breaks the law because he or she is honestly mistaken about the reality of the situation lacks the mens rea for the crime.[xiii] And if the person lacks the mens rea for the crime, they cannot be held accountable for those actions. For example, if a man hits another man because he believed he was about to be hit, then he lacks the required mens rea and will not be held accountable for his actions.

Christine Twomey

2024-03-21

Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.

Brendan huisman

2024-03-18

Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!

Guerline Menard

2024-03-18

Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️

Keisha Parris

2024-03-15

Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.

Taïko Beauty

2024-03-15

I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!

Anthony Williams

2024-03-12

Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.

Loveth Okpedo

2024-03-12

Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience

Bee L

2024-02-28

Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.

divesh patel

2024-02-24

I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Load more

Google rating score: 4.9 of 5, based on 736 reviews

There is also a concept known as a mistake of law, but this does not negate the mens rea of an individual the way in which the mistake of fact typically would. When a person commits an act, and has every intention of doing so, but does not realize it was illegal –he still has the mens rea for the crime committed.[xiv] Just because you do not realize your actions are illegal, does not mean you are not responsible for those actions. You still have every intention of committing that that act and it just turns out to be illegal. Even if you argue that you would not have committed the crime if you knew it was illegal, that does not matter. Every citizen is expected to understand the law and not break it – even for things you were unaware were illegal.

An example of this could be if Beth sells cocaine, which she honestly believes is legal to do in the United States. Technically, Beth has the mens rea to commit the act, even if she does not believe the act was illegal. The mens rea goes to the act itself – not the later belief about whether or not it was illegal. If it were permissible to say “I did not know it was illegal to do that” and the court allows that person to get off – then no one would be culpable for anything. Everyone would just say “Judge, I did not know it was illegal” and then no one would be held accountable for their actions.

There are more crimes that require intentional acts. There are some laws that will only punish the violator if the person knowingly engage in an illegal activity.[xv] What is required of a person to know to be guilty of the crime will depend on the behavior that makes the act illegal to begin with.[xvi] For example, a drug law makes it illegal for a person to knowingly import an illegal drug into the United States.[xvii] In order for a defendant to be convicted of this crime, the prosecutor will have to prove to the jury or judge that the defendant knew that what he brought into the United States was an illegal drug.[xviii]

Now, there are crimes that require malice or willful behavior.[xix] Most people hear the word malicious and immediately think spiteful or wicked, but there is a different meaning under the law. Under the law, malicious means intentional and knowing.[xx] Malice is often used under the murder statutes. Another term that is commonly heard is malice aforethought. Malice aforethought is the state of mind necessary to prove first-degree murder.[xxi] The prosecution must prove that the defendant intended to cause the death or great bodily harm to the victim, or the defendant exhibited extreme and reckless indifference to the value of life.[xxii]

Crimes that Do Not Require Any Mental State

Some laws do not require a mens rea at all. These laws are called strict liability laws.[xxiii] These laws do not require any type of mental state when committing the crime, nor do these laws take into account that the person committing the crime may be morally innocent, meaning they had no idea what they were doing was a crime.[xxiv] These laws are known as strict liability laws, and the public policy behind these laws are the social benefits of strict enforcement of particular laws. This benefit of enforcing these particular laws is to protect a certain group of people. The following laws are enforced to protect minors.

Statutory rape is a strict liability crime.[xxv] Statutory rape laws are enforced in the majority states, and it makes it illegal to have sexual intercourse with a minor – even if the defendant honestly and reasonably believed that the minor was an adult, who would have been old enough to consent to the sexual intercourse.[xxvi] Under the strict liability crime law, it does not matter whether or not the adult knew the minor was actually a minor.

Selling alcohol to minors is another strict liability crime that is enforced in the majority of states.[xxvii] This law punishes clerks who sell alcohol to minors, even if the clerk honestly believed that the minor was an adult. It also does not matter whether or not the clerk looked at the minors identification and did not realize that identification was fake – it is still a strict liability crime and the clerk will be found guilty.  Contact an experienced Phoenix criminal defense attorney for additional information on mental states in a criminal case.

[i] See How Defendant’s Mental States Affect Their Responsibility for a Crime NOLO Legal Encyclopedia (Accessed August 24, 2016) http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/crime-mental-state-defendant-29951.html

[ii] Id.

[iii] See What is Criminal Negligence NOLO Legal Encyclopedia (Accessed August 24, 2016) http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-criminal-negligence.html

[iv] Id.

[v] Id.

[vi] See What is Negligent Homicide? Free Advice Legal (Accessed August 23, 2016) http://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/criminal-law/violent_crimes/negligent-homicide.htm

[vii] Id.

[viii] Id.

[ix] Id.

[x] See What is Negligent Homicide? Free Advice Legal (Accessed August 23, 2016) http://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/criminal-law/violent_crimes/negligent-homicide.htm

[xi] Id.

[xii] See How Defendant’s Mental States Affect Their Responsibility for a Crime NOLO Legal Encyclopedia (Accessed August 24, 2016) http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/crime-mental-state-defendant-29951.html

[xiii] Id.

[xiv] Id.

[xv] Id.

[xvi] See How Defendant’s Mental States Affect Their Responsibility for a Crime NOLO Legal Encyclopedia (Accessed August 24, 2016) http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/crime-mental-state-defendant-29951.html

[xvii] Id.

[xviii] Id.

[xix] Id.

[xx] Id.

[xxi] See Malice Forethought NOLO Legal Encyclopedia (Accessed August 24, 2016) https://www.nolo.com/dictionary/malice-aforethought-term.html

[xxii] Id.

[xxiii] See How Defendant’s Mental States Affect Their Responsibility for a Crime NOLO Legal Encyclopedia (Accessed August 24, 2016) http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/crime-mental-state-defendant-29951.html

[xxiv] Id.

[xxv] See Statutory Rape NOLO Legal Encyclopedia (Accessed August 24, 2016) http://www.nolo.com/dictionary/statutory-rape-term.html

[xxvi] Id.

[xxvii] See How Defendant’s Mental States Affect Their Responsibility for a Crime NOLO Legal Encyclopedia (Accessed August 24, 2016) http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/crime-mental-state-defendant-29951.html