24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Client Testimonials

5

THE BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR.

The BEST LAWYER ANYONE COULD ASK FOR!!! Todd changed our lives! He’s not JUST a lawyer representing us for a case. Todd and his office have become Family. When we entered his office in August of 2022, we entered with such anxiety, uncertainty, and so much stress. Honestly we were very lost. My husband and I felt alone. How could a lawyer who didn’t know us, know our family, know our background represents us, When this could change our lives for the next 5-7years that my husband was facing in Federal jail. By the time our free consultation was over with Todd, we left his office at ease. All our questions were answered and we had a sense of relief.

schedule a consultation

Blog

Overcoming Hearsay Objections Using FRE 803 Exceptions

March 21, 2024 Uncategorized

Overcoming Hearsay Objections Using FRE 803 Exceptions

Hearsay evidence can often be a major roadblock in trials. But luckily, there are a number of exceptions that can help you get hearsay admitted into evidence. In this article, we’ll break down the various exceptions under Federal Rule of Evidence 803 that can help you overcome those pesky hearsay objections.

What is Hearsay?

First, a quick refresher on what hearsay is. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. In other words, if you’re trying to admit a statement that was made outside of court to prove that what was said is true, then it’s hearsay.

There are a few reasons why hearsay is generally prohibited:

  • No opportunity to cross-examine the declarant
  • Statement could be unreliable
  • Jury can’t assess declarant’s demeanor

So unless a hearsay exception applies, hearsay evidence will be excluded. This is where FRE 803 comes in!

FRE 803 – The Hearsay Exceptions

Federal Rule of Evidence 803 contains 24 exceptions to the hearsay rule. These exceptions allow hearsay to be admitted into evidence, regardless of whether the declarant is available to testify. Let’s break down some of the most useful FRE 803 exceptions for overcoming those hearsay objections:

Present Sense Impression

A present sense impression is a statement describing an event or condition made while or immediately after the declarant perceived it. For example, a witness testifies that when she heard a crash outside, she ran to the window and heard a bystander say “That car just ran the red light!” The bystander’s statement would likely be admissible under 803(1).

Excited Utterance

An excited utterance is a statement relating to a startling event made while under the stress or excitement caused by the event. So if a witness is still emotional or distraught from an incident when they make a statement about it, that statement would likely fall under 803(2). For example, a witness tells police “He shot me!” minutes after being shot would be admissible as an excited utterance.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition

Under 803(3), a statement of the declarant’s then-existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition is not excluded by the hearsay rule. So a victim’s statements that they were feeling scared of the defendant would likely be admissible under this exception.

Statements for Medical Diagnosis or Treatment

Statements made for medical diagnosis or treatment are admissible under 803(4). For example, a sexual assault victim’s statements to a nurse about how the assault occurred would likely be admissible under this exception. The rationale is that statements made for medical treatment are reliable because the declarant has a self-interest in being truthful to receive proper care.

Recorded Recollection

Under 803(5), a record that memorializes a matter about which the witness once had knowledge, but now has insufficient recollection, can be admitted as an exception to hearsay. For example, if a witness can no longer remember details of an event, you could show them their diary entry or email written at the time to prove what happened.

Records of a Regularly Conducted Activity

Also referred to as the business records exception, 803(6) allows records of a regularly conducted activity to be admitted into evidence as an exception to hearsay. This covers things like medical records, employment records, and other business documents. As long as they were made in the regular course of that business, these records can be admitted over a hearsay objection.

Public Records

Under 803(8), records, reports, statements or data compilations made by a public office can be exempted from the hearsay rule. Police reports, court records, and other public documents could potentially come into evidence this way.

Learned Treatises

Statements contained in published treatises, periodicals, or pamphlets on a subject of history, medicine, or other science or art can also be exempted from the hearsay rule under 803(18). So if an expert witness is testifying, you may be able to read excerpts from authoritative texts to prove the theories upon which the expert is relying.

Reputation Concerning Character

Under 803(21), reputation evidence regarding a person’s character may be admitted into evidence over a hearsay objection. So you may be able to have a witness testify to the defendant’s reputation in the community for being peaceful or violent.

Judgment of a Previous Conviction

Finally, 803(22) allows evidence of a final judgment of conviction to be admitted into evidence if offered to prove any fact essential to the judgment. So certified copies of convictions can come in as non-hearsay.

How to Use These Exceptions

When you’re seeking to admit hearsay statements, think creatively about how they might fit into one of these exceptions. Present sense impressions, excited utterances, and statements of medical diagnosis are especially useful in the context of first responder or victim statements. Business and public records also come up frequently.

When you want to admit hearsay, lay the proper foundation to establish that an exception applies. Be prepared to explain why the statement bears guarantees of trustworthiness satisfying the rationale behind the hearsay rule. And keep in mind that the availability of the declarant may affect the admissibility analysis – for example, if the declarant is available to testify, prior inconsistent statements offered for impeachment may be preferable to hearsay exceptions.

While hearsay objections can often stand in the way of introducing important evidence, FRE 803 gives you plenty of tools to overcome them. With the right preparation and foundation, you can get that hearsay admitted by fitting it into one of the exceptions. It takes creativity and understanding the rationale behind the rules, but it can be done!

Lawyers You Can Trust

Todd Spodek

Founding Partner

view profile

RALPH P. FRANCHO, JR

Associate

view profile

JEREMY FEIGENBAUM

Associate Attorney

view profile

ELIZABETH GARVEY

Associate

view profile

CLAIRE BANKS

Associate

view profile

RAJESH BARUA

Of-Counsel

view profile

CHAD LEWIN

Of-Counsel

view profile

Criminal Defense Lawyers Trusted By the Media

schedule a consultation
Schedule Your Consultation Now