ppp loan fraud defense lawyers

Thanks for visiting Federal Lawyers, a second-generation firm managed by our lead attorney – with over 50 years combined experience defending federal fraud prosecutions nationwide. If you’re facing PPP loan fraud charges in New Jersey, you’re dealing with federal prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney’s Offices in Newark, Trenton, or Camden who have made pandemic fraud a top enforcement priority. These offices have prosecuted hundreds of PPP and EIDL cases since 2020, securing indictments against business owners throughout Bergen County, Essex County, Hudson County, and across the state for alleged false statements on loan applications, misuse of funds, and what prosecutors call “loan stacking” schemes. What makes New Jersey cases particularly aggressive is the district’s history with financial fraud – federal prosecutors here built their reputations on corporate fraud cases and apply that same intensity to PPP prosecutions, treating small business owners like sophisticated fraudsters even when mistakes were made in good faith during economic chaos.

New Jersey’s PPP Prosecution Landscape

The District of New Jersey has been relentless. Prosecutors in Newark have charged defendants with bank fraud carrying 30-year maximums for conduct like inflating employee counts by just a few workers, overstating payroll by amounts that seem negligible compared to the loan size, or spending proceeds on expenses they believed were legitimate business costs but which prosecutors now claim were personal. Take the case that made headlines in Bergen County – business owner charged with obtaining $500,000 across three entities, with prosecutors arguing the companies were shells created solely to multiply loan amounts. Defense argued the entities were legitimate, separately managed, and entitled to individual loans under SBA guidance. Jury convicted anyway. That’s the climate in New Jersey right now.

EIDL Fraud Prosecutions

New Jersey prosecutors also target Economic Injury Disaster Loans aggressively, particularly cases involving identity theft where defendants allegedly used stolen information to apply for multiple EIDL advances. These cases often involve younger defendants – some in their early twenties – who prosecutors claim participated in fraud rings submitting hundreds of applications using fabricated businesses and stolen identities. The sentences have been harsh: defendants with no prior records receiving multi-year prison terms for conduct prosecutors frame as sophisticated identity theft schemes, even when the defendant’s role was minimal or they were following instructions from others without fully understanding the criminality.

DEFENSE TEAM SPOTLIGHT

Todd Spodek

Lead Attorney & Founder

Featured on Netflix's "Inventing Anna," Todd Spodek brings decades of high-stakes criminal defense experience. His aggressive approach has secured dismissals and acquittals in cases others deemed unwinnable.

NY Bar Admitted Multi-State Licensed Federal Courts

Meet the Full Team

Legal Scenario: What Would You Do?

Scenario

You received a PPP loan of $150,000 for your small restaurant during the pandemic, but your accountant inflated payroll numbers on the application to qualify for a larger amount than you were entitled to. Now you've received a target letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office in Newark indicating you're under investigation for PPP loan fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343.

Can I be held criminally responsible for the fraudulent PPP application even though my accountant prepared it and I didn't know the numbers were inflated?

Attorney's Answer

Federal prosecutors must prove you knowingly made false statements to obtain PPP funds, so if you genuinely had no knowledge of the inflated figures, that lack of intent is a strong defense under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and § 1014. However, prosecutors will argue that as the business owner who signed the application and certified its accuracy, you had a duty to verify the information before submitting it to the SBA-approved lender. We would immediately work to preserve all communications between you and your accountant, obtain the original payroll records, and potentially negotiate with the government for a voluntary repayment arrangement before charges are filed. Early intervention in PPP fraud cases has proven critical, as the DOJ's COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force has secured convictions carrying sentences of up to 20 years, but cooperation and restitution can substantially reduce exposure.

This is general information only. Contact us for advice specific to your situation.

Common Defense Challenges in NJ Federal Court