24/7 call for a free consultation 212-300-5196

AS SEEN ON

EXPERIENCEDTop Rated

YOU MAY HAVE SEEN TODD SPODEK ON THE NETFLIX SHOW
INVENTING ANNA

When you’re facing a federal issue, you need an attorney whose going to be available 24/7 to help you get the results and outcome you need. The value of working with the Spodek Law Group is that we treat each and every client like a member of our family.

Prima Facie Negligence – What is it and how do you prove it?

Prima Facie Negligence – What is it and how do you prove it?

What is Prima Facie Negligence?

Prima facie negligence is a legal concept that refers to a situation where the facts of a case are sufficient to prove negligence on the part of the defendant, unless the defendant can provide evidence to rebut the presumption of negligence. In other words, if the plaintiff can establish a prima facie case of negligence, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant to prove that they were not negligent.To establish a prima facie case of negligence, the plaintiff must prove four elements:

  1. The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff
  2. The defendant breached that duty of care
  3. The breach of duty caused harm to the plaintiff
  4. The plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the harm

If the plaintiff can prove these four elements, they have established a prima facie case of negligence, and the burden shifts to the defendant to rebut the presumption of negligence.

How do you prove Prima Facie Negligence?

Proving prima facie negligence requires gathering evidence to support each of the four elements of negligence. Here are some ways to prove each element:

1. Duty of Care

To prove that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, you must show that the defendant had a legal obligation to act in a certain way to avoid causing harm to the plaintiff. This duty can arise from a variety of sources, such as:

  • A statute or regulation that requires certain conduct
  • A contractual obligation
  • A special relationship between the parties (such as a doctor-patient relationship)
  • The general duty to act with reasonable care in a given situation

For example, if you were injured in a car accident caused by another driver, you would need to show that the other driver had a duty to operate their vehicle with reasonable care to avoid causing harm to others on the road.

2. Breach of Duty

To prove that the defendant breached their duty of care, you must show that they failed to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would have exercised in the same situation. This can be proven through evidence such as:

  • Eyewitness testimony
  • Photographs or video footage of the incident
  • Expert testimony about the standard of care in a given situation
  • Documentation of the defendant’s actions or inactions

For instance, if you were injured by a defective product, you could use expert testimony to show that the manufacturer failed to meet industry standards for product safety, breaching their duty of care to consumers.

Christine Twomey
Christine Twomey
2024-03-21
Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.
Brendan huisman
Brendan huisman
2024-03-18
Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!
Guerline Menard
Guerline Menard
2024-03-18
Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️
Keisha Parris
Keisha Parris
2024-03-15
Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.
Taïko Beauty
Taïko Beauty
2024-03-15
I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!
Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
2024-03-12
Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.
Loveth Okpedo
Loveth Okpedo
2024-03-12
Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience
Bee L
Bee L
2024-02-28
Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.
divesh patel
divesh patel
2024-02-24
I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

3. Causation

To prove that the defendant’s breach of duty caused harm to the plaintiff, you must show that the harm would not have occurred but for the defendant’s negligence. This can be proven through evidence such as:

  • Medical records showing the nature and extent of the plaintiff’s injuries
  • Expert testimony about the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries
  • Eyewitness testimony about the sequence of events leading up to the harm

For example, if you were injured in a slip and fall accident at a store, you could use surveillance footage to show that the store failed to clean up a spill in a timely manner, causing you to slip and fall.

4. Damages

To prove that the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the harm caused by the defendant’s negligence, you must show that the plaintiff incurred actual losses or expenses. This can be proven through evidence such as:

  • Medical bills and records
  • Lost wage documentation
  • Receipts for out-of-pocket expenses related to the injury
  • Expert testimony about the value of the plaintiff’s pain and suffering

For instance, if you were injured in a car accident caused by another driver, you could use your medical bills and records to show the cost of your treatment and any ongoing care you may need as a result of the accident.

Element of Negligence Examples of Evidence
Duty of Care Statutes, regulations, contracts, special relationships
Breach of Duty Eyewitness testimony, photographs, expert testimony
Causation Medical records, expert testimony, eyewitness testimony
Damages Medical bills, lost wage documentation, expert testimony

At Spodek Law Groupwe understand how overwhelming it can be to navigate a personal injury case, especially when you’re dealing with the physical and emotional aftermath of an accident or injuryThat’s why our experienced attorneys are here to help you every step of the way.We’ll work with you to gather the evidence needed to establish a prima facie case of negligence and hold the responsible parties accountable for their actions. From investigating the incident to consulting with experts and negotiating with insurance companies, we’ll be by your side throughout the entire process.Don’t let the negligence of others go unchallenged. Contact Spodek Law Group today at 212-300-5196 or visit our website at https://www.federallawyers.com to schedule a consultation with one of our skilled personal injury attorneys. Together, we can fight for the compensation you deserve and help you move forward with your life.

Frequently Asked Questions about Prima Facie Negligence

What does “prima facie” mean?

“Prima facie” is a Latin term that means “at first sight” or “on the face of it.” In the context of negligence law, it refers to a case where the evidence presented by the plaintiff is sufficient to establish negligence on the part of the defendant, unless the defendant can provide evidence to rebut the presumption of negligence.

What is the difference between negligence and gross negligence?

Negligence refers to a failure to exercise reasonable care in a given situation, while gross negligence refers to a conscious and voluntary disregard for the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable harm to persons or property. Gross negligence is a more serious form of negligence that can result in higher damages awards.

Can I still recover damages if I was partially at fault for my injury?

In some cases, yes. Many states follow a rule called comparative negligence, which allows plaintiffs to recover damages even if they were partially at fault for their injury. Under this rule, the amount of damages awarded to the plaintiff is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to them. For example, if you were found to be 20% at fault for your injury and your total damages were $100,000, you would be able to recover $80,000.

How long do I have to file a negligence lawsuit?

The amount of time you have to file a negligence lawsuit, known as the statute of limitations, varies by state and type of case. In most states, the statute of limitations for personal injury cases is two or three years from the date of the injury. However, there are some exceptions and variations depending on the specific circumstances of your case. It’s important to consult with an experienced personal injury attorney as soon as possible after your injury to ensure that you don’t miss any important deadlines.At Spodek Law Group, we know that dealing with a personal injury can be stressful and overwhelming. That’s why we’re here to help you navigate the legal process and fight for the compensation you deserve. Don’t wait to get the legal support you need. Contact us today at 212-300-5196 or visit our website at https://www.federallawyers.com to schedule a consultation with one of our experienced personal injury attorneys. We’re here for you every step of the way.

Schedule Your Consultation Now