Tool Free:
888-765-4321
Over 50 Years Of Experience On Your Team.
24/7 Legal Help.
Receiving a Queens High Net Worth Divorce Lawyer are a serious matter. I see the government interfering in your private property, especially when huge assets are in question, and that’s where we must fight back aggressively. New York Domestic Relations Law § 170 sets the grounds for divorce, and it imposes rules that can let the court intrude into your finances. Todd Spodek has appeared in major media outlets. He leads our firm with a mindset that government agencies try to burden you. We push back so you don’t get blindsinded by rules designed to advantage the system over you, but we use every legal remedy to protect your side.
You might fear that judges will pry into your bank records and real estate holdings without mercy. The government’s overreach can feel unstoppable when the court schedules hearings under 22 NYCRR 202.16. That rule requires detailed financial disclosures. We defend you by filing the right motions to limit invasive inquiries, and we rely on Majauskas v. Majauskas, 61 N.Y.2d 481, to ensure that assets division remain fair. Todd Spodek has a second-generation legacy. We never let your stance get swallowed by the system. We also handle every phase of the litigation with a readiness to pivot if the government tries to push new deadlines prematurely.
Look, the stakes is too high for letting the government rummage around without oversight. Under New York Domestic Relations Law § 236(B), courts must use equitable distribution methods, but they keep broad powers to rummage through corporate shares, retirement accounts, and intangible assets. We fight by demanding a thorough Bill of Particulars that forces the other side to specify claims, so the judge can’t rely on speculation, and that approach is essential. This is how Todd Spodek’s experience shapes our relentless stance toward government infiltration. He was profiled on that Netflix show featuring Anna Delvey’s case. Our office has a “white glove” attitude, but we also question every request so that you dont get hammered by excessive intrusions.
Many of our clients ask if they should settle quickly to avoid the government’s watchful eye. Under S.Z. v. E.Z., 140 A.D.3d 1171 (2d Dep’t 2016), the appellate court reversed a rushed settlement that undervalued marital property, so a hasty deal can haunt you. Todd Spodek prefers precision, not panic. We present alternative dispute resolution approaches that keep control in your hands. If the government attempts to meddle in your private finances, we file protective orders right away under CPLR 3103. This step stop the other side from prying into irrelevant data, because the government never hesitates to back them up if you stand alone.
We also keep a digital portal so you can track your case. This platform, unique to Spodek Law Group, let’s you see updates on court filings, hearing dates, and every document we submit. Meanwhile, the government tries to bury you in compliance demands that come with short deadlines under 22 NYCRR 202.16(f). We respond by streamlining your disclosures and limiting their scope through timely objections, driving the government crazy because they want broad power. Todd Spodek’s nationwide presence means we can appear in different jurisdictions if your assets cross state lines. That tactic stops state agencies from cornering you in one place.
High net worth divorces often trigger forensic accounting, and the government’s eyes are all over that process. Under DRL § 237, courts can appoint experts who rummage through your finances to gauge spousal maintenance. We do not accept the idea that these experts are neutral, because the government loves to shape their agenda behind the scenes. We confront these experts in depositions, we demand clarity on how they evaluate stock options, and we cite Wasserman v. Wasserman, 66 A.D.3d 880 (2d Dep’t 2009), to show that ignoring key evidence is reversible error. Todd Spodek invest time in exploring every fact so your wealth does not vanish under the government’s watch.
Some folks worry about custody battles overshadowing asset division. New York Domestic Relations Law § 240 covers custody determination, and the government tends to roam wherever it wants in deciding the childs best interests. We step in by requesting psychological evaluations under 22 NYCRR 202.16(g), so we can show the court that the government’s perspective might not capture the full story. Todd Spodek uses a strict approach to investigating all angles, and that includes your child’s routine, schooling, and emotional ties. The government tries to insert itself as a moral authority, but we keep them in check one motion at a time.
People sense that fighting City Hall is a lost cause, but I refuse to let the government shape your entire life. You have a right to question the valuations placed on your assets, and we do that by seeking updated appraisals under DRL § 236(B)(4). Todd Spodek’s experience with media appearances in places like the NY Post helps us push back because high-profile attention often deters unfair treatment. The courts rely on rigid formulas for spousal support under the spousal maintenance guidelines, which are found in DRL § 236(B)(5-a). We keep them honest by introducing evidence that accounts for every relevant factor, not just the big lumpsum the government sees.
Here’s the thing, you deserve clarity on how child support gets calculated. Family Court Act § 413 sets forth the percentages based on income, but the government rarely cares about how that formula hits premium lifestyles. Todd Spodek stands firm against letting the government flatten your living standards, and we show receipts for private tutoring, specialized medical needs, or extracurricular expenses. If they try to ignore that data, we file immediate motions in Supreme Court referencing Bast v. Rossoff, 91 N.Y.2d 723 (1998), to require a more nuanced approach. Our firm’s 24/7 availability ensure no filing deadline passes unchallenged, because the government would prefer you miss them.
I understand a High Net Worth Divorce can last many months. The court issues preliminary conference dates, usually within 45 days of filing the Request for Judicial Intervention under 22 NYCRR 202.16(d). We watch those deadlines closely so you don’t get ambushed by the administration. Todd Spodek keeps a personal approach: He returns calls, sets late-night consults, and double-checks every piece of evidence. We dont leave you alone to fend off random government letters demanding more forms, we get on the phone and challenge them at once.
Our strict method includes cross-examining every witness that the government tries to bring. If they produce an accountant, we scrutinize their methodology under CPLR 4515. That rule covers expert testimony. Todd Spodek built his nationwide footprint so we can gather out-of-state witnesses or records swiftly. We gather emails, text messages, or phone logs that shows the real story behind your finances, because the government wants to rely on partial data. By the time we finish, the judge sees that you are not just a bank account for them to dissect, you are a person with rights.
Our firm invests in modern technology to expedite each filing. We operate from New York City and Los Angeles, giving Todd Spodek the flexibility to appear wherever you need him. The government tries to strongarm us with local procedural quirks, but we push back using key precedents like Farkas v. Farkas, 11 N.Y.3d 300 (2008). That ruling clarifies that matrimonial attorneys can raise issues about hidden assets at any stage. We remain vigilent so the government cannot hamper you with local rules that favor your spouse’s position.
Sometimes, the press feature your divorce, and that invites the government to pry even more. We do not shy away from that spotlight, we utilize public scrutiny as leverage to keep agencies honest. Todd Spodek represented Anna Delvey. That case was covered extensively, so he is used to complicated matters. Under DRL § 75, we can also address jurisdiction for custody if your child resides out of state, preventing any confusion that the government can twist in its favor. We unify all these procedures into one cohesive defense, ensuring your voice stands strong in the face of a system that tries to push you around.
I realize you want to see if we’re the right fit, and we only take on clients we can genuinely help. That’s how we preserve our quality of representation and keep the government from devouring your resources in endless litigation. Todd Spodek leads the firm as a second-generation attorney, continuing a family tradition of advocacy. We combine that history with our “white glove” style, mean we maintain consistent communication and total transparency in fees. We stand by you from the moment you call, because the system tries to isolate you, and we refuse to let that happen.
Please feel free to email us any questions regarding services that we may assist you with. You may also contact us by mail, telephone or fax.
