Concord, NH – When an 18-year-old high school senior dates a 15-year-old sophomore, should this be a crime? To avoid criminalizing teen relationships, many states have passed so-called “Romeo and Juliet” laws providing defenses against statutory rape charges if the participants are close in age. But some argue New Hampshire’s laws go too far in decriminalizing teen sex. Do they do more harm than good?
Romeo and Juliet laws are meant to provide defenses or reduced penalties for statutory rape in cases where the participants are close in age. The intent is to avoid punishing consensual teen relationships as harshly as adult molestation of children.
New Hampshire doesn’t have one single Romeo and Juliet law. Rather, protections are built into the overall statutory rape laws through age thresholds and mitigated punishments. For example:
So while sex with minors is illegal, there are graduated penalties if the ages are close.
Supporters argue the laws strike a fair balance. They point out:
However, opponents believe the laws are misguided. Their concerns include:
Looking at how the laws have played out highlights the complexities. For instance:
These mixed results show judges still have discretion on whether to apply Romeo and Juliet protections.
If policymakers re-examined the laws, here are some possible changes:
Each approach has trade-offs regarding protecting minors versus fairness to young offenders.
New Hampshire’s Romeo and Juliet laws try to strike a balance but remain controversial. Perhaps the debate reflects larger social ambivalence about teen sex. But lawmakers have an obligation to continually reassess these laws and their impacts on youth.
Please feel free to email us any questions regarding services that we may assist you with. You may also contact us by mail, telephone or fax.