Oklahoma Snap Violation Lawyers
Contents
- 1 You Need a SNAP Violation Lawyer, Here’s Why
- 2 What is a SNAP Violation?
- 3 The Clock is Ticking
- 4 Building Your Defense
- 5 Taking it to Court
- 6 Protecting Your Livelihood
- 7 The Spodek Law Group Advantage
- 8 It’s Time to Fight Back
- 9 Dealing with SNAP Trafficking Charges
- 10 Understanding Trafficking Charges
- 11 Building an Aggressive Defense
You Need a SNAP Violation Lawyer, Here’s Why
You’re here because you received a SNAP violation letter from the USDA, and you need help, fast. But, take a deep breath. We‘ve got you covered.At Spodek Law Group, we’re experts at handling SNAP violation cases. We’ve defended over 300 retailers nationwide against allegations of SNAP fraud, trafficking, and other violations. Our quick and decisive action can help address any charges while preventing loss of revenue or customers.It’s simple. Every single client deserves honesty and white glove service. We understand what’s at stake – your business, your livelihood. That‘s why we fight tirelessly to get the best possible outcome.
What is a SNAP Violation?
Let’s start with the basics. SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) is the modern version of food stamps. It provides funds to low-income households via an EBT (Electronic Benefit Transfer) card to purchase eligible food items.As a SNAP-approved retailer, you must follow strict rules set by the USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS). Any violation of these rules can result in fines, temporary disqualification, or even permanent removal from the SNAP program.Common SNAP violations include:
- Trafficking benefits (exchanging SNAP funds for cash)
- Allowing purchase of ineligible items (alcohol, cigarettes, etc.)
- Providing false information on SNAP applications
Sounds serious, right? It is. Losing SNAP authorization can cripple your business, especially if EBT transactions are a major revenue source.
The Clock is Ticking
Here’s the kicker – you only have 10 days to respond to that violation letter. No extensions, no deferments. Fail to respond within that window, and the USDA will disqualify you by default.That’s why you need to act fast and hire an experienced SNAP violation attorney. At Spodek Law Group, we can rapidly analyze your case, gather evidence, and craft a strong defense strategy tailored to your situation.Our attorneys have intimate knowledge of SNAP regulations and FNS procedures. We know what evidence they need, what arguments they’ll make, and how to counter them effectively.
Building Your Defense
But, we don‘t just respond – we prepare an aggressive defense aimed at keeping you in the SNAP program. Here’s how:First, we‘ll review the charges and any evidence provided by the USDA. Things like transaction logs, witness statements, even video footage. We look for holes, inconsistencies, anything we can use to weaken their case.Next, we gather evidence supporting your side of the story. Employee accounts, store policies, inventory records – everything that demonstrates your compliance efforts and intent to follow SNAP rules.With the facts established, we build legal arguments showing why the charges are unfounded, unclear, or an overreach by the USDA. We cite relevant case law, regulations, even past USDA decisions.Throughout, we remain in close contact, ensuring you understand the process and know what to expect. No smoke and mirrors – just transparency and a strategic legal plan.
Taking it to Court
If the USDA refuses to back down after our response, we’re prepared to escalate by requesting an administrative review. This is essentially an informal court hearing where we can present witnesses, cross-examine the USDA’s personnel, and make our case directly.Should the administrative review fail, federal court is the next step. As your SNAP violation lawyers, we’ll file for judicial review and argue vigorously why the USDA’s determination was incorrect or unjustified.At each stage, our deep familiarity with SNAP laws and court procedures gives you a potent advantage. We know how to leverage every argument and piece of evidence to maximize your chances of success.
Protecting Your Livelihood
Look, we get it – the thought of taking on the federal government is daunting. Fines, disqualification, maybe even criminal charges feel like apocalyptic stakes for a small business owner.But, you don’t have to face this situation alone. Spodek Law Group has been through this fight hundreds of times before. We understand the USDA’s tactics and how to counter them effectively.More importantly, we recognize what this means for you and your employees. Losing SNAP authorization isn’t just an inconvenience – it could devastate your business and jeopardize countless livelihoods.That’s why we take this just as seriously as you do. When you hire us as your SNAP violation lawyers, you get a team of heavy-hitters committed to protecting your rights and future.
The Spodek Law Group Advantage
What sets us apart? For starters, our attorneys have over 50 years of combined experience handling high-stakes legal battles nationwide. We’re not some local firm learning on the job.Secondly, we‘re a second-generation firm with a proven track record. Our founding partner, Todd Spodek, is an internationally-recognized legal expert featured on major media outlets.We’ve also invested heavily in a state-of-the-art digital platform that allows seamless communication and case management. You can track every development, share documents securely, and reach us anytime.Finally, our firm takes a pragmatic approach focused on results over reputation. We’re not afraid to battle the government head-on using every legal avenue available. Our only priority is winning for our clients.
It’s Time to Fight Back
That SNAP violation letter wasn’t a suggestion – it was a declaration of war against your business. Don’t go in outnumbered and outgunned.Hire Spodek Law Group as your SNAP violation defense team, and fight back with the elite legal representation you deserve. We‘ll protect your rights, your revenue stream, and your ability to continue serving your community.The moment you receive that letter, the clock starts ticking. But, with our rapid response capabilities, we can still get ahead of this and put you in the best position to maintain your SNAP authorization.It all starts with a call. Reach out to us today for a free consultation, and let’s get to work defending your livelihood. No judgment, no runaround – just an elite legal team ready to have your back.
Dealing with SNAP Trafficking Charges
Of all the potential SNAP violations, trafficking is considered the most serious offense. It typically involves the exchange of SNAP benefits for cash, firearms, ammunition, or illegal substances.For retailers, trafficking charges often stem from purchasing inventory using SNAP funds, then reselling those items for cash. Even if unintentional, this practice is illegal and can result in permanent disqualification from SNAP.As your SNAP violation lawyers, we take trafficking allegations extremely seriously. Not just because they jeopardize your business, but because they can also expose you to criminal prosecution and potential jail time.
Understanding Trafficking Charges
When the USDA pursues trafficking charges, they‘ll provide evidence like:
- Transaction data showing patterns of suspicious activity
- Witness statements from undercover agents or informants
- Video recordings of alleged trafficking incidents
- Seized inventory suspected of being purchased with SNAP benefits
Their goal? To prove you knowingly engaged in the unlawful purchase, sale, stealing or exchange of SNAP benefits for cash or non-food items.On its face, some of this evidence can seem quite damning. Multiple $500+ transactions followed by a $0 balance on the EBT card? Surveillance footage appearing to show cash changing hands? We get why you‘re worried.But, appearances can be deceiving. That‘s where Spodek Law Group’s expertise separates us from other SNAP violation lawyers.
Building an Aggressive Defense
First, we‘ll analyze every shred of evidence, looking for holes, inconsistencies, or violations of proper investigative procedure. Did the USDA overstep its authority? Were evidence handling protocols followed? We‘ll find and exploit any potential weaknesses.Next, we‘ll construct a counternarrative using witness accounts, financial records, and other documentation. Perhaps that $500 transaction was simply for high-value items like meat or formula. Maybe the cash wasn’t for SNAP benefits, but another legitimate purpose.Our goal is to raise reasonable doubt that any trafficking occurred, much less that you knew about it or sanctioned it. With the right evidence and arguments, we can punch massive holes in the USDA’s case.