The COVID-19 pandemic led to an unprecedented level of government assistance for small businesses in order to keep them afloat during widespread shutdowns and economic turmoil. However, the speed at which these aid programs were rolled out, combined with reduced oversight, also opened the door for significant fraud and abuse. This article will examine legal issues around Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) fraud in Washington state, including applicable laws, potential defenses, and implications for those accused of defrauding these Small Business Administration loan programs.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, passed in March 2020, authorized over $650 billion in forgivable PPP loans intended to cover payroll and other business expenses during COVID-19 shutdowns. An additional $20 billion was approved for EIDL loans and grants to provide working capital for small businesses suffering substantial economic injury due to the pandemic.
While these programs threw a critical lifeline to millions of firms, the speed of disbursement meant reduced vetting of applications and eligibility. The SBA Office of Inspector General estimates over $200 billion in potentially fraudulent EIDL and PPP loans were distributed, out of $1.2 trillion total disbursed.
Several federal statutes are commonly used to prosecute fraud related to the PPP, EIDL, and other SBA loan programs:
Defendants face up to 30 years in prison for wire and bank fraud, and mandatory consecutive 2-year terms for aggravated ID theft. Other charges like money laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956) may apply as well.
Some of the most common fraudulent activities reported in PPP and EIDL cases include:
The alleged fraud amounts in individual cases prosecuted by the Department of Justice range from several hundred thousand dollars to over $35 million.
Despite the scope for abuse, these emergency programs still helped millions of small businesses survive the pandemic. For those accused of COVID-19 loan fraud, potential defenses include:
An experienced federal fraud defense attorney can analyze the prosecution’s evidence and identify the best defense strategy for your situation.
Potential penalties for convictions include:
Sentences are based on federal guidelines that account for the fraud amount, sophistication of the scheme, leadership role, criminal history, and other factors.
Beyond direct penalties, a conviction can have significant collateral impacts:
Please feel free to email us any questions regarding services that we may assist you with. You may also contact us by mail, telephone or fax.