Criminal Defense Lawyers

Why Are Federal Appeals Often Denied?

Why Are Federal Appeals Often Denied?

When you’ve been convicted of a federal crime, filing an appeal can feel like your last hope for justice. But the harsh reality is that federal appeals are often denied. At Spodek Law Group, we’ve seen countless clients devastated when their appeals don’t succeed. It’s a tough pill to swallow, especially after investing so much time, money, and emotional energy into the process.So why are federal appeals denied so frequently? What pitfalls should you watch out for? And is there anything you can do to improve your chances of success?In this comprehensive guide, we’ll break down the key reasons federal appeals get rejected and what you need to know to give your appeal the best shot possible. With over 50 years of combined experience handling federal appeals, our attorneys have unique insight into what works – and what doesn’t – when it comes to overturning convictions.Let’s dive in and explore why the appellate process is so challenging and how you can navigate it successfully with the right legal strategy.

The Harsh Reality: Most Federal Appeals Fail

Before we get into the specifics, it’s important to understand just how difficult winning a federal appeal really is. The statistics paint a sobering picture:

• Over 90% of federal criminal appeals are unsuccessful
• Less than 7% result in a reversal or remand
• Only about 2.3% of appeals lead to a complete reversal of the conviction

Those aren’t great odds. But don’t lose hope just yet! While appeals are undoubtedly an uphill battle, having an experienced federal appeals lawyer on your side can dramatically improve your chances of success.At Spodek Law Group, we’ve helped numerous clients beat the odds and win their appeals against all expectations. It takes skill, strategy, and an intimate knowledge of the federal appellate system – but it is possible.Now let’s look at some of the key reasons appeals get denied so we can understand how to avoid these common pitfalls.

Reason #1: Procedural Errors and Missed Deadlines

One of the most frustrating ways to lose an appeal is through simple procedural mistakes or missed filing deadlines. The federal appeals process is extremely technical and time-sensitive. Even minor errors can get your entire appeal thrown out before the court ever considers its merits.Some common procedural pitfalls include:

• Filing the notice of appeal too late (usually within 14 days of the judgment)
• Not properly serving notice to all required parties
• Failing to include necessary documents or information in your brief
• Not following strict formatting and citation requirements
• Missing deadlines for submitting briefs or other materials

We’ve seen brilliant legal arguments get tossed out because of silly typos or missed deadlines. It’s heartbreaking, but it happens all too often.That’s why having an experienced federal appeals attorney is so crucial. At Spodek Law Group, we have a meticulous system for tracking deadlines and double-checking every filing. We know all the procedural ins-and-outs and can ensure your appeal isn’t derailed by technicalities.

Reason #2: Lack of Preservation of Issues for Appeal

Here’s a harsh truth many defendants don’t realize until it’s too late: you can’t raise new issues on appeal that weren’t properly preserved during the original trial.What does that mean exactly? Essentially, if your trial attorney didn’t object to something at the time or raise a particular legal argument, you generally can’t bring it up for the first time on appeal. The appellate court will only consider issues that were properly “preserved” in the trial court record.This catches a lot of people off guard. We often have clients come to us wanting to appeal based on issues they feel are obvious errors or injustices. But if those issues weren’t raised and preserved during trial, our hands are often tied.Some examples of issues that need to be preserved:

• Objections to evidence or testimony
• Challenges to jury instructions
• Arguments about the sufficiency of evidence
• Constitutional claims

The lesson here? It’s critical to have a skilled trial attorney who understands how to properly preserve issues for a potential appeal. And if you’re considering an appeal, you need to carefully review the trial record to see what issues were actually preserved.At Spodek Law Group, we conduct an exhaustive review of trial records to identify every possible preserved issue we can raise on appeal. We leave no stones unturned.

Christine Twomey

2024-03-21

Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.

Brendan huisman

2024-03-18

Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!

Guerline Menard

2024-03-18

Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️

Keisha Parris

2024-03-15

Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.

Taïko Beauty

2024-03-15

I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!

Anthony Williams

2024-03-12

Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.

Loveth Okpedo

2024-03-12

Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience

Bee L

2024-02-28

Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.

divesh patel

2024-02-24

I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Load more

Google rating score: 4.9 of 5, based on 736 reviews

Reason #3: Deferential Standard of Review

Many people assume an appeal is like a do-over of the trial, where the appellate court will take a fresh look at all the evidence and arguments. But that’s not how it works at all.In reality, appellate courts give a lot of deference to the original trial court’s decisions. They’re not there to second-guess the jury or retry the case. Instead, they’re looking for clear legal errors that affected the outcome.This “deferential standard of review” means the appeals court will only overturn decisions if there’s a clear abuse of discretion or error of law. They generally won’t disturb factual findings or credibility determinations made by the trial court.Some key standards of review to be aware of:

• Clear error: For factual findings, the appeals court will only reverse if there’s a “clear error” – meaning the finding was completely unsupported by evidence.
• Abuse of discretion: For decisions within the trial judge’s discretion (like evidentiary rulings), the appeals court will only reverse for a clear “abuse of discretion.”
• De novo: For pure questions of law, the appeals court will review “de novo” – meaning they’ll look at the issue fresh without deference to the trial court.

This deferential approach makes winning an appeal much harder. It’s not enough to show the trial court might have been wrong – you have to show they were clearly and undeniably wrong.At Spodek Law Group, we know how to craft arguments that overcome this high bar. We focus on identifying clear legal errors and constitutional violations that demand reversal even under this deferential standard.

Reason #4: Harmless Error Doctrine

Even if you can show the trial court made an error, that’s often not enough to win an appeal. Under the “harmless error doctrine,” appellate courts will only reverse if the error actually affected the outcome of the case.In other words, if the court determines the defendant would have been convicted anyway even without the error, they’ll consider it “harmless” and uphold the conviction.This doctrine trips up a lot of appeals. We’ve seen cases with obvious errors that still get affirmed because the overall evidence of guilt was so strong.Some key things to know about harmless error:

• The burden is usually on the defendant to show the error wasn’t harmless
• Courts look at the error in the context of all the evidence presented at trial
• Constitutional errors get stricter scrutiny than non-constitutional ones
• Some errors (like denial of counsel) are considered automatically harmful

Overcoming the harmless error doctrine takes skill and strategy. At Spodek Law Group, we know how to frame errors as truly prejudicial and show how they likely impacted the outcome. We build compelling narratives that demonstrate why an error simply can’t be brushed off as harmless.

Reason #5: Limited Scope of Review

Another common stumbling block is the limited scope of what appellate courts will actually consider. They’re generally restricted to reviewing only what’s in the official trial court record.That means:

• No new evidence can be introduced on appeal
• You can’t raise arguments or objections that weren’t made at trial
• The court won’t consider events or information outside the record

This catches many defendants off guard. We often have clients who want to introduce new evidence they’ve discovered or raise issues that came up after trial. But in most cases, that’s simply not allowed in a direct appeal.There are some limited exceptions, like ineffective assistance of counsel claims that often require evidence outside the trial record. But for the most part, you’re stuck with what’s already in the official record.This is why it’s so crucial to build a strong record at trial and make all necessary objections and arguments. Once you get to the appeal stage, it’s often too late to fix mistakes or oversights from the original proceedings.At Spodek Law Group, we conduct an exhaustive review of the trial record to identify every possible issue we can raise. We know how to craft compelling arguments using only the information available in the official record.

Reason #6: High Bar for Ineffective Assistance Claims

Ineffective assistance of counsel is one of the most common grounds for appeal. But it’s also one of the hardest claims to win.Courts set an extremely high bar for proving your trial attorney was constitutionally ineffective. It’s not enough to show they made mistakes or could have done a better job. You have to prove:

1. Their performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness
2. There’s a reasonable probability the outcome would have been different with competent counsel

This is an incredibly difficult standard to meet. Courts give a lot of deference to trial attorneys’ strategic decisions. And even if you can show deficient performance, proving it affected the outcome is another huge hurdle.Some common ineffective assistance claims include:

• Failure to investigate or call key witnesses
• Failure to file important motions
• Failure to object to inadmissible evidence
• Failure to request crucial jury instructions
• Giving bad advice about plea deals

At Spodek Law Group, we have extensive experience with ineffective assistance claims. We know how to investigate trial counsel’s performance and build a compelling case for why it fell short of constitutional standards. We also know how to demonstrate the prejudice caused by ineffective representation.

Reason #7: Strict Rules on Plain Error Review

What happens if your trial attorney failed to object to something important? Can you still raise that issue on appeal?The answer is yes, but it’s much harder. When an issue wasn’t properly preserved with an objection, appellate courts will only review it for “plain error.”Plain error review has an extremely high bar:

1. There must be an error
2. The error must be plain (clear or obvious)
3. The error must affect substantial rights (i.e., the outcome)
4. The error must seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings

This is an incredibly difficult standard to meet. The vast majority of plain error claims fail. Courts are very reluctant to reverse convictions based on issues that weren’t raised at trial.That’s why it’s so crucial to have a skilled trial attorney who knows how to properly preserve issues for appeal. Once you’re in the plain error territory, your chances of success plummet.At Spodek Law Group, we have extensive experience navigating plain error review. We know how to identify those rare instances where an unpreserved error is so egregious it demands reversal even under this strict standard.

Reason #8: Limited Grounds for Habeas Corpus Relief

If your direct appeal fails, a habeas corpus petition is often seen as a last resort. But the grounds for habeas relief are extremely limited, especially in federal cases.Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), federal habeas relief for state prisoners is only available if the state court decision:

1. Was contrary to or an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, or
2. Was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts

For federal prisoners, the grounds are even more restricted. You generally can’t raise issues that were or could have been raised on direct appeal.Some potential grounds for federal habeas relief include:

• Ineffective assistance of counsel
• Brady violations (prosecution withholding evidence)
• Newly discovered evidence of actual innocence
• Unconstitutional changes in law

But the bar for winning on these grounds is incredibly high. Courts give extreme deference to the original conviction and prior court decisions.At Spodek Law Group, we have extensive experience with both state and federal habeas petitions. We know how to navigate the complex procedural rules and craft compelling arguments that overcome the high barriers to relief.

How to Improve Your Chances of Winning a Federal Appeal

While the odds are stacked against federal appellants, there are things you can do to maximize your chances of success. Here are some key strategies we employ at Spodek Law Group:

1. Conduct a thorough review of the trial record: We leave no stones unturned in identifying potential issues for appeal.
2. Focus on clear legal errors: We prioritize issues where the trial court clearly misapplied the law or violated constitutional rights.
3. Craft compelling legal arguments: Our briefs are meticulously researched and persuasively written to overcome the high bars for reversal.
4. Emphasize prejudice and harm: We show how errors concretely affected the outcome and undermined the fairness of proceedings.
5. Navigate procedural hurdles: We ensure all filing deadlines are met and technical requirements are followed to the letter.
6. Prepare extensively for oral arguments: Our attorneys conduct multiple moot courts to sharpen their arguments before the appellate panel.
7. Consider collateral attacks: If direct appeal options are exhausted, we explore other avenues like habeas petitions or motions for new trials.

The key is having an experienced federal appeals attorney who understands the unique challenges of appellate practice. At Spodek Law Group, we have a proven track record of success in federal appeals against seemingly insurmountable odds.

Don’t Give Up Hope – Contact Spodek Law Group Today

If you’re facing a federal appeal, don’t lose hope. While the process is undoubtedly challenging, having the right legal team on your side can make all the difference.At Spodek Law Group, we have over 50 years of combined experience handling federal appeals across the country. We’ve helped numerous clients overturn their convictions and win their freedom against all expectations.Our attorneys are former federal prosecutors who understand how the system works from the inside. We know what arguments resonate with appellate judges and how to craft winning strategies even in the toughest cases.Don’t trust your appeal to just any lawyer. You need a team with the skill, experience, and determination to fight for you every step of the way.Call Spodek Law Group today at 212-300-5196 for a free consultation on your federal appeal. Let us put our expertise to work for you and give your case the fighting chance it deserves.Remember, an appeal may be your last shot at justice. Make it count with Spodek Law Group on your side.