Criminal Defense Lawyers

Why Are Federal Sentences Often Longer?

Why Are Federal Sentences Often Longer?

At Spodek Law Group, we’ve seen firsthand how federal sentences can be SHOCKINGLY longer than state sentences for similar crimes. If you’re facing federal charges, you might be wondering WHY the penalties are so much harsher. We’re here to break it down for you and explain some of the key reasons behind those lengthy federal prison terms.

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines: A Rigid Framework

One of the BIGGEST factors behind longer federal sentences is the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. These guidelines create a complex scoring system that judges use to determine sentences.

How the Guidelines Work

The sentencing guidelines use two main factors to calculate a recommended sentence range:

1. The offense level (1-43)
2. The defendant’s criminal history category (I-VI)

These two numbers are plotted on a sentencing table to determine the recommended prison term in months. For example:

As you can see, even small increases in offense level or criminal history can lead to DRAMATICALLY longer sentences. And federal crimes often have high base offense levels to start with.

Limited Judicial Discretion

While the guidelines are no longer mandatory, judges still have to calculate and consider them. Many judges stick closely to the guideline range, leading to more predictable – but often harsher – sentences than you’d see in state court.We’ve had clients SHOCKED to learn that a judge has little wiggle room to go below the guideline range without specific legal justification. It’s not like TV where the judge can just decide to be lenient!

Enhancements Stack Up Quickly

The guidelines include TONS of specific offense characteristics and adjustments that can quickly ratchet up the offense level. Things like:

Christine Twomey

2024-03-21

Just had my Divorce case settled 2 months ago after having a horrible experience with another firm. I couldn’t be happier with Claire Banks and Elizabeth Garvey with their outstanding professionalism in doing so with Spodek Law Group. Any time I needed questions answered they were always prompt in doing so with all my uncertainties after 30 yrs of marriage.I feel from the bottom of my heart you will NOT be disappointed with either one. Thanks a million.

Brendan huisman

2024-03-18

Alex Zhik contacted me almost immediately when I reached out to Spodek for a consultation and was able to effectively communicate the path forward/consequences of my legal issue. I immediately agreed to hire Alex for his services and did not regret my choice. He was able to cover my case in court (with 1 day notice) and not only was he able to push my case down, he carefully negotiated a dismissal of the charge altogether. I highly recommend Spodek, and more specifically, Alex Zhik for all of your legal issues. Thanks guys!

Guerline Menard

2024-03-18

Thanks again Spodek law firm, particularly Esq Claire Banks who stood right there with us up to the finish line. Attached photos taken right outside of the court building and the smile on our faces represented victory, a breath of fresh air and satisfaction. We are very happy that this is over and we can move on with our lives. Thanks Spodek law 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙌🏼❤️

Keisha Parris

2024-03-15

Believe every single review here about Alex Z!! From our initial consultation, it was evident that Alex possessed a profound understanding of criminal law and a fierce dedication to his clients rights. Throughout the entirety of my case, Alex exhibited unparalleled professionalism and unwavering commitment. What sets Alex apart is not only his legal expertise but also his genuine compassion for his clients. He took the time to thoroughly explain my case, alleviating any concerns I had along the way. His exact words were “I’m not worried about it”. His unwavering support and guidance were invaluable throughout the entire process. I am immensely grateful for Alex's exceptional legal representation and wholeheartedly recommend his services to anyone in need of a skilled criminal defense attorney. Alex Z is not just a lawyer; he is a beacon of hope for those navigating the complexities of the legal system. If you find yourself in need of a dedicated and competent legal advocate, look no further than Alex Z.

Taïko Beauty

2024-03-15

I don’t know where to start, I can write a novel about this firm, but one thing I will say is that having my best interest was their main priority since the beginning of my case which was back in Winter 2019. Miss Claire Banks, one of the best Attorneys in the firm represented me very well and was very professional, respectful, and truthful. Not once did she leave me in the dark, in fact she presented all options and routes that could possibly be considered for my case and she reinsured me that no matter what I decided to do, her and the team will have my back and that’s exactly what happened. Not only will I be liberated from this case, also, I will enjoy my freedom and continue to be a mother to my first born son and will have no restrictions with accomplishing my goals in life. Now that’s what I call victory!! I thank the Lord, My mother, Claire, and the Spodek team for standing by me and fighting with me. Words can’t describe how grateful I am to have the opportunity to work with this team. I’m very satisfied, very pleased with their performance, their hard work, and their diligence. Thank you team!

Anthony Williams

2024-03-12

Hey, how you guys doing? Good afternoon my name is Anthony Williams I just want to give a great shout out to the team of. Spodek law group. It is such a honor to use them and to use their assistance through this whole case from start to finish. They did everything that they said they was gonna do and if it ever comes down to it, if I ever have to use them again, hands-down they will be the first law office at the top of my list, thank you guys so much. It was a pleasure having you guys by my side so if you guys ever need them, do not hesitate to pick up the phone and give them a call.

Loveth Okpedo

2024-03-12

Very professional, very transparent, over all a great experience

Bee L

2024-02-28

Amazing experience with Spodek! Very professional lawyers who take your case seriously. They treated me with respect, were always available, and answered any and all questions. They were able to help me very successfully and removed a huge stress. Highly recommend.

divesh patel

2024-02-24

I can't recommend Alex Zhik and Spodek Law Firm highly enough for their exceptional legal representation and personal mentorship. From the moment I engaged their services in October 2022, Alex took the time to understand my case thoroughly and provided guidance every step of the way. Alex's dedication to my case went above and beyond my expectations. His expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to achieving the best possible outcome were evident throughout the entire process. He took the time to mentor me, ensuring I understood the legal complexities involved to make informed decisions. Alex is the kind of guy you would want to have a beer with and has made a meaningful impact on me. I also want to acknowledge Todd Spodek, the leader of the firm, who played a crucial role in my case. His leadership and support bolstered the efforts of Alex, and his involvement highlighted the firm's commitment to excellence. Thanks to Alex Zhik and Todd Spodek, I achieved the outcome I desired, and I am incredibly grateful for their professionalism, expertise, and genuine care. If you're in need of legal representation, look no further than this outstanding team.

Load more

Google rating score: 4.9 of 5, based on 736 reviews

• Use of a weapon (+2 levels)
• Causing bodily injury (+2 to +6 levels)
• Leadership role (+2 to +4 levels)
• Obstruction of justice (+2 levels)

Before you know it, that base offense level of 14 has ballooned to 26 or higher. And each increase means more prison time.Have questions about how the guidelines might apply in your case? Give us a call at 212-300-5196 for a free consultation. We’ll help you understand what you’re up against.

Mandatory Minimum Sentences: No Way Around Them

Another HUGE factor in long federal sentences is mandatory minimum penalties set by Congress. These apply to many drug, gun, and child exploitation offenses.

Common Mandatory Minimums

Some examples of federal mandatory minimums include:

• 5 years for possessing 5 grams of methamphetamine
• 10 years for possessing 1 kg of heroin
• 15 years for armed career criminals (3+ violent felonies)
• 10 years for using a gun during a drug crime
• 15 years for producing child pornography

Unlike the guidelines, judges CANNOT go below these minimums except in very limited circumstances. Even if the judge thinks the sentence is too harsh, their hands are tied by the law.

Stacking Charges

Federal prosecutors often bring multiple charges that carry mandatory minimums. These can stack on top of each other, leading to INSANELY long sentences.For example, we once had a client charged with:

• Conspiracy to distribute cocaine (10 year min)
• Using a firearm in furtherance of drug trafficking (5 year consecutive min)
• Felon in possession of a firearm (15 year min as armed career criminal)

Just those three charges alone added up to a 30 year MANDATORY MINIMUM sentence if convicted! And that’s before any guideline enhancements.

Limited Safety Valve Relief

There is a “safety valve” provision that allows judges to go below mandatory minimums for certain low-level, non-violent drug offenders. But the criteria are very strict:

• No more than 4 criminal history points
• No leadership role
• No gun involvement
• Full cooperation with the government
• No death or serious injury caused

In our experience, many defendants don’t qualify for safety valve relief. And even if they do, the reduction is often modest.Worried about facing harsh mandatory minimums? Contact us ASAP at 212-300-5196. The sooner we get involved, the more options we may have to fight the charges or negotiate with prosecutors.

Differences in Charging Decisions

It’s not just sentencing laws that lead to longer federal terms. The way cases are charged and prosecuted also plays a big role.

Cherry-Picking the Worst Cases

Federal prosecutors have a lot of discretion in which cases they take on. They tend to focus on larger, more serious cases while leaving lower-level offenses to state courts.So right off the bat, federal cases often involve more significant criminal conduct that warrants longer sentences.

Bringing Multiple Charges

State prosecutors might charge someone with one or two counts for a particular crime. Federal prosecutors, on the other hand, tend to pile on charges.We’ve seen federal indictments with 10, 20, even 30+ counts for what’s essentially one course of criminal conduct. Each charge represents another opportunity for conviction and more prison time.

Conspiracy Charges

Federal prosecutors LOVE conspiracy charges. These allow them to hold defendants accountable for the actions of co-conspirators, even if they weren’t directly involved.Conspiracy charges also make it easier to prove guilt and often carry the same penalties as the underlying offense. So instead of having to prove you actually distributed drugs, they just have to show you agreed to be part of the operation.

Using Prior Convictions

Federal prosecutors are very aggressive about using prior convictions to enhance sentences. Things like:

• Filing 851 enhancements to double mandatory minimums for drug priors
• Charging defendants as Armed Career Criminals
• Using acquitted conduct to increase guideline ranges

State prosecutors don’t always have the same tools or incentives to pursue these enhancements.Feel like you’re being overcharged in federal court? We can help. Call 212-300-5196 to discuss strategies for fighting back against aggressive federal charging decisions.

Limited Alternatives to Incarceration

In state court, judges often have options besides prison – things like probation, home confinement, or drug treatment programs. Federal judges have far fewer alternatives available.

Probation Rarely an Option

The sentencing guidelines make probation available only for the lowest-level offenses (Zone A of the sentencing table). For most federal crimes, some amount of incarceration is required.Even when probation is technically allowed, many judges are reluctant to use it given the serious nature of federal offenses.

Limited Use of Home Confinement

Home detention can sometimes be used as a substitute for a short prison term. But it’s typically limited to:

• The last 10% of a sentence (up to 6 months)
• Part of a split sentence (some prison + some home detention)

It’s rarely used as a complete alternative to incarceration in federal cases.

Few Diversion Programs

While some federal districts have drug courts or other specialty programs, they’re not nearly as common or accessible as in state systems. Most federal defendants don’t qualify for these limited programs.

Restricted “Good Time” Credit

Federal prisoners can earn up to 54 days of good conduct time per year served. But that only reduces a sentence by about 15% at most. Many state systems offer more generous credits that can cut sentences by 30-50%.Looking for alternatives to a lengthy federal prison term? We may be able to help. Contact us at 212-300-5196 to explore your options.

The Culture of Federal Sentencing

Beyond just the laws and procedures, there’s a culture around federal sentencing that tends to produce longer terms.

“Tough on Crime” Mentality

Federal judges and prosecutors often see themselves as dealing with the “worst of the worst” offenders. There’s an institutional bias towards harsh punishment to deter crime and protect the public.We’ve had clients STUNNED to hear a judge say that a 10-year sentence is “relatively short” for a federal case. The frame of reference is just different than in state court.

Limited Local Connections

State judges and prosecutors usually have deep ties to the local community. They see the human impact of long sentences up close.Federal officials often lack those connections. It can be easier to hand down a 20-year sentence when you don’t have to see the impact on families and neighborhoods in your own backyard.

Career Advancement Incentives

Let’s be real – federal prosecutors often have political ambitions. Securing long sentences in high-profile cases can be a boost to their careers. There’s less incentive to offer lenient plea deals or recommend shorter terms.

Lack of Cost Considerations

State systems have to balance sentencing with the realities of limited prison space and budgets. The federal system doesn’t face the same constraints. There’s less pressure to reduce sentences for financial reasons.Frustrated by the culture of harsh federal sentencing? We understand. Call us at 212-300-5196 to discuss how we can fight for a fair outcome in your case.

How We Can Help

Facing federal charges is SCARY, especially when you realize how much prison time might be on the line. But don’t lose hope! At Spodek Law Group, we have extensive experience navigating the federal criminal justice system.Here are some ways we may be able to help reduce your potential sentence:

• Challenge the charges and evidence to avoid conviction entirely
• Negotiate favorable plea agreements to minimize exposure
• Argue for downward departures and variances from the guidelines
• Present compelling mitigating evidence at sentencing
• Pursue safety valve relief or substantial assistance reductions
• Appeal improper sentences

Every case is unique, but we’ve helped many clients avoid worst-case scenarios and secure significantly reduced sentences.Don’t wait to get help. The earlier we get involved, the more we can do. Call us today at 212-300-5196 for a free, confidential consultation about your federal case.Remember, you’re not alone in this fight. With our experienced federal defense team on your side, you’ll have a strong advocate working to protect your rights and freedom. Let us put our knowledge and skills to work for you!